https://twitter.com/statsguyphd/status/1324352213595181059

Twitter ^ | Nov 5, 2020 | Statsguyphd

[Paridel]

This thread shows the voting statistics for Milwaukee, Wikipedia are very suspect.

Source Tweet: https://twitter.com/statsguyphd/status/1324352213595181059

Threadreader: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1324353113483075586.html

[jacknhoo]

Source Tweet: https://twitter.com/statsguyphd/status/1324352213595181059

Threadreader: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1324353113483075586.html

[Pollard]

I am making these tweets to explain in one place some analysis that was done last night. 1 - I was asked offline about doing Benford's on election data. I explained that this is common and a useful way to detect anomalies in data that are driven by artificial process (e.g. fraud)

Basically a statistical analysis of the ballots that shows anomalies in the case of Biden. He got an artificial bump.

[Pollard]

12 - And here are the raw numbers (1 to 9):
Biden: [86, 35, 52, 69, 79, 62, 42, 28, 22]
Trump: [115, 85, 89, 57, 35, 36, 27, 16, 16]

13 - Here are the respective p-values:
Biden 1.5076774999383611e-27
Trump 0.00048111250713426005

Not sure but I’m guessing the 69, 79, 62 for Biden is ballots being injected at 3-4am as has been reported.

[PGR88]

[TeddyRay]

Systemic corruption and vote fraud.

[Boogieman]

No, those are frequency counts of digits 1-9, so 69 is the count of “4”s, 79 is the count of “5”s, etc.