Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time lapse graphs of other local races in MI and WI at 4 am

Posted on 11/05/2020 8:35:22 AM PST by Truthsearcher

Can some enterprising person pull up some time lapse graphs of the votes in Michigan and WI for that crucial 4-5 am period where over 130,000 votes all for Biden came in. I'm wondering if similar vote totals for other local races all got a bump or was it just the presidential vote that saw the jump. It would include senate, congress, and state legislature races. I'd like to see a forensic analysis of where those 130K people voted on the other races (if they voted for other races at all).


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/05/2020 8:35:22 AM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

2 posted on 11/05/2020 8:41:38 AM PST by Pollard (You can’t be for “defunding the police” and against “vigilantism” at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher
Careful about barking about the 138k all-Biden dump. "One Michigan issue of about 130,000 (138+k)Biden was a clerical error-- (involving no Ferrari drops):
-----------------------------------------------------

A 3 am MI issue was the result of an extra digit tacked onto a vote total... exactly the size of the 3 am dump.

153710 -15371 ----------- =138339

...which was exactly the size of that dump.

I want verification this error was corrected, HOWEVER, that still leaves unexplained 15,731 ALL-BIDEN votes. I want answers.

3 posted on 11/05/2020 8:42:04 AM PST by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

Great question! To refine it further, did US Senate candidates like Peters in MI experience the same sudden count increase at the same time? I presume that votes on each race on a specific ballot are counted essentially simultaneously. Unfortunately, I haven’t found the data yet (but I haven’t looked hard for it).


4 posted on 11/05/2020 8:42:42 AM PST by Hetuck ("We will Barry you" - Nikita Khrushchev)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

I’m not sure I buy the explanation, because shouldn’t we see a immediate increase followed by an immediate decrease when this error was removed?

I only see the spike but I don’t see the corresponding drop when the error was corrected.


5 posted on 11/05/2020 8:48:29 AM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher
Ballot Harvesting 101...

https://townhall.com/columnists/brucebialosky/2019/02/10/the-stupidity-of-ballot-harvesting-and-how-it-steals-elections-n2540993
6 posted on 11/05/2020 8:49:12 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher
MIDNIGHT SUN - A Time-Lapse Adventure
7 posted on 11/05/2020 8:54:49 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

that’s not how it works. They dump the 153,710 Biden votes on to the total, then admit an error that it was only 15,371, then reduce the total by 15,371 and presto chang-o they get an extra 138,339 for Biden. This makes them look fair and objective and the gullible media laps it up.


8 posted on 11/05/2020 8:55:57 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

I guess they all had to head to Denny’s, Waffle House, and/or Dunken Donuts for their early morning coffee.


9 posted on 11/05/2020 8:56:20 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

I don’t have access to the running totals, do you ? I’ve only seen two comparative screen shot showing Biden’s total jump by 138k+ with no other totals on either screenshot increased.

One official explained it, so it was apparently caught and corrected. The precise numbers leave no other conclusion.

That still leaves 13,751(0) votes exclusively for Biden which is equally as ridiculous


10 posted on 11/05/2020 9:11:12 AM PST by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

Supreme Court must throw out ALL mail in ballots and only count in-person voting and verifiable absentee ballots.

Mail-in ballots are a violation of the constitution. Mail in ballots are equivalent to a “twitter survey”. A mail-in ballot is a ‘ballot’, not a ‘vote’.

Votes are in person verifiable ID and absentee verifiable request with ID – A constitutionally protected VOTE. Everything else is unprotected BS and SC must throw them out in EVERY state. Most expeditiously, in the swing states.


11 posted on 11/05/2020 9:21:14 AM PST by Lions Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Careful about barking about the 138k all-Biden dump. “One Michigan issue of about 130,000 (138+k)Biden was a clerical error— (involving no Ferrari drops):


Even though people witnessed the whole show including the clerical error of filming it; they were just seeing late night - early morning pizza deliveries, as well as imagining being barred from entering the building or being in the room by the ACLU, the governor and other officials


12 posted on 11/05/2020 9:42:20 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson