Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
I just posted this on another thread:


I heard the dejection in David Webb's voice this morning on Sirius XM.

The issue is apparently that even if there is evidence of massive vote fraud, there is no remedy. The courts cannot take back votes in a system of secret voting.

The prevailing sentiment seems to be that the only thing that can be done is to try the enablers of the crime, while the organizations that committed the crime still get to reap the benefits of that crime. To that extent, a recanvas (not just a recount, as talk radio is calling it) would be like discovery; it would force the states to open the books, match the counts to names and signatures in the logs, and could provide enough evidence of tampering to try officials themselves.

Personally, I think there is more that can be done here. I do believe there is a remedy. That remedy is to get the Supreme Court to invalidate the certifications of the contested state elections as a whole, not a onesy-twosy of a vote here or there.

The way to do it is this:

  1. Hold the recanvas and document the inconsistencies in the books.
  2. Prove that it is systemic and not just a statistical anomaly. Name names of perpetrators and provide whistleblower testimony, if possible.
  3. Argue in front of the Supreme Court that the Constitution provides for the remedy of the state legislature, acting as the representative of the people in a republic, to select the Electors in a failsafe situation, as long as the Court finds the management of the election to be so fraudulent and untrustworthy as to vote to decertify it.
  4. Then have the GOP state legislatures meet to vote on the slate of Electors to send to the Electoral College, backed up by a Supreme Court ruling that the certification was based on false premises.

Would they do it? Probably not.

President Trump would take it as far as he can to expose the plot for the American people to see. Hopefully, this will be remembered the next time the people turn out to vote. Also hopefully, people will realize that these election officials are their neighbors who shop at the same grocery stores, whose children go to the same schools, and will be shunned from polite society until they repent for their crimes.

But once the crimes are exposed, will SCOTUS have the nerve to overturn the state courts who are in on the coup? Will the state GOP have the nerve to step up and advocate for it, or will they revert back to their true nature of cowering from power and giving in to Democrat bully tactics?

I think we all know the answers to these questions, but the path forward is clear.

Seek to have the certifications of these elections overturned as hopelessly tainted and untrustworthy, and use the power of the Constitution to save the Constitution.


-PJ

1,113 posted on 11/06/2020 8:58:34 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

If the Supreme Court doesn’t Act, Trump can and should invoke the Insurrection Act.


1,132 posted on 11/06/2020 9:28:15 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
The numerical vote would then just be irrelevant. The state legislatures would just appoint their electors and the state legislatures lean...😜
1,156 posted on 11/06/2020 10:15:21 AM PST by Axenolith (WWG1WGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
David Webb: The issue is apparently that even if there is evidence of massive vote fraud, there is no remedy.

If the watermark rumor is true, they can just pull the unmarked ballots and do a recount.

Someone must have printed the unmarked ballots. Surely there's a whistleblower at a printing company somewhere.

1,218 posted on 11/06/2020 11:34:39 AM PST by AZLiberty (As of Monday, May 18, at 9:30 am, I'm a U.S. citizen. And I VOTED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

I don’t think anyone is going touch taking an election away from a guy who will win by probably close to 4.5 million popular votes.


1,437 posted on 11/06/2020 4:32:45 PM PST by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
arg...I didn't finish before I posted.

I don’t think anyone is going touch taking an election away from a guy who will win by probably close to 4.5 million popular votes even though those 4.5 million will mstly come from California.
1,440 posted on 11/06/2020 4:37:06 PM PST by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson