Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave W
I still don’t see how that would make much of a difference. If you are relying that much on people who take voting so lightly then you already have a problem.

I think the mail-in voting is a much bigger issue to address, since it is aimed at voters who are lazy and/or driven by fear. That’s likely to be a predominantly Democratic cohort.

78 posted on 11/04/2020 3:51:56 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child; Dave W

I am with Dave - early voting is a significant contributor. This is part of the “ground game” - it tells the party whose door they need to knock on, or whose ballot one needs to fill out. As those numbers dwindle. The board of elections in turn provides daily updates.

Alberta is right too = where mail in became easier or more prevalent. It has a higher propensity for fraud. It made it easier to skip the early voting and go “help” people fill out their ballot.

Results would be vastly different if election day were held only on the 1st Tuesday after the 1st Monday, and absentee ballots only by legitimate excuse. The convenience and decline in public morality have had negative consequences on the integrity of the election.


96 posted on 11/04/2020 4:28:08 AM PST by Susquehanna Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson