Posted on 11/03/2020 9:40:34 AM PST by Signalman
Wall Street knows Trump is going to be re-elected.
(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...
You can fool people but you can’t fool money.
Wall St. Journal says it’s because they’re sure the Dems are going to sweep both houses and the Presidency, thus insuring a generous stimulus package.
CNN
Stocks surge again as Wall Street doubles down on its Joe Biden bet
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/03/investing/dow-stock-market-election-day/index.html
CNN says its due to expected Biden win.
Yep. There are two groups of people who don’t act like activist pollsters, because the skin that they have in their prediction games is real world money> That’s Vegas and Wall Street
Well that cinches it for me. If CNN thinks it is because of a Biden win we know Trump has this in the bag.
When has CNN been right about anything in recent memory?
NOT BUYING IT.
The logic is flawed.
A TRUMP sweep does the same thing.
BESIDES they are slaves to the flawed polls.
Even if the dims won Trump is still the president til January 20.
As a long time WSJ reader, I’ve noticed the news section has made a very leftward tilt over the past ten years, by now you’re almost reading content you’d find in the New York Times. The Op/Ed section still is fairly conservative. It’s two publications in one.
“Wall St. Journal says its because theyre sure the Dems are going to sweep both houses and the Presidency, thus insuring a generous stimulus package.”
In recent years, I have observed that the politics of Wall St. and corporate executives has shifted. It seems that many in positions of influence are hardcore Democrats looking to cash in on crony capitalism.
Hmmm
Smelling a Trump landslide?
WSJ was pushing an absurd poll of Biden +10 nationally just yesterday. It’s become almost a liberal rag lately.
...because stockholders LOVE to pay taxes and be under gov control. /sar
The wall street execs are all Dems, but the 85% of rank and file are all Republican. It’s the rank and file that wat Trump and will but on Trump re-election hopes.
“As a long time WSJ reader, Ive noticed the news section has made a very leftward tilt over the past ten years, by now youre almost reading content youd find in the New York Times. The Op/Ed section still is fairly conservative. Its two publications in one.”
Several months ago, about three hundred WSJ reporters on the “news” side signed a letter protesting the “inaccuracy” and “lack of transparency” of many contributors to the editorial and op-ed pages. I hope Rupert Murdoch told the signers that they are welcome to look for work elsewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.