I don’t dispute the numbers in your chart as I’ve seen similar elsewhere, but there is a flaw. As an example, a 94.6% survival rate implies a 5.4% fatality rate, not 0.054%. The middle column is off by a factor of 100. Still a good story though.
Just one point—it ain’t my chart. I just posted a twit from some dude/dudette cause it looked interesting to check out.