Posted on 10/27/2020 2:26:43 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
A West Side security guard was allegedly attacked by two sisters he told to wear masks and use hand sanitizer — one of the women holding him by the hair while the other stabbed him more than two dozen times.
“It’s the complete randomness of this. It’s terrifying,” Judge Mary Marubio said Tuesday while ordering the sister held without bail on attempted murder charges.
The argument at Snipes shoe store in Lawndale escalated Sunday when 18-year-old Jayla Hill took out her phone and began filming a guard who asked them to leave for refusing to use personal protective equipment, Cook County prosecutors said.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicago.suntimes.com ...
Perfect.
Must I LOOK?
NO....I did NOT need to look.
Consensus has determined it is not in your best interest.
Damn white security guard.
Those were some angry sisters.
We did not even have to look to know what they looked like. Lady thugs who will eventually raise kids with thug attitudes that will keep our corrections officers employed.
Haitian is black .... or Asian ?
“Are they out on bail yet?”
Out on Bail, they should be covered by the local leash laws.
Somebody just glancing at the headline (50% plus of readers) would conclude that these were right-wing Trump supporters. But, actually, no.
Haiti is mostly black.
Remember the woman who slugged a flight attendant because she and her boyfriend didn’t want to buckle their seatbelts? She imparted this bit of wisdom: “It’s 2020 and we don’t have to listen to you anymore!” The rule is very simple: no one gets to tell black people what to do, no matter the circumstances.
Buckle up? I don’t have to listen to you, bitch!
Put on a mask like everyone else? Hell no! I’m gonna cut you good
Drop the knife? I be dropping one of you...
Two ugly fatties. After a few years in prison, they won’t be able to waddle through their cell doors. Sheesh.
If I see a black person anywhere in a mask zone NOT wearing a mask, I take mine off in order to show full support for my oppressed brother.
Twice I was on the verge of being lectured by some whiney white socialist about wearing my mask and both times they backed off when I simply directed mine and their eyes towards the unmasked black person. Did it on airplane too.
Give blacks (sorry for stereotyping) some credit on this. They tend to have a good nose for BS and a low tolerance for being pushed around.
One of ‘em brought her stabbing knife to go shopping, eh?
The following is from Chapter 2 of the Constitution of Jamaica,
A person born in Jamaica after August 5, 1962, or born outside Jamaica after that date to a parent who is a Jamaican citizen, is automatically considered a Jamaican citizen at birth. Furthermore, under current Jamaican legislation, citizens of Jamaica can hold multiple nationalities. And this status does not prohibit serving in the legislature of Jamaica. It is inconceivable to me that the intent of the framers of Article II would have been to allow such a thing for POTUS or VPOTUS.
Harris was born in Oakland, CA, on Oct. 20, 1964, and her father was a citizen of Jamaica at the time of her birth. Therefore, the law of Jamaica is clear: Kamala Harris is a citizen of Jamaica, pursuant to Section 3Cb of the Constitution of Jamaica. This law is very similar to the US Immigration and Naturalization Act with regard to children born to US citizens outsider of the boundaries of the US or it’s territories.
Wong Kim Ark was the subject of an 1898 SCOTUS ruling involving citizenship. The court held that Wong Kim Ark was a CITIZEN (not a natural born one) by virtue of the 14th amendment, noting that his Chinese citizen parents were lawfully resident within the US at the time of his birth, and completely self supporting.
The 14th amendment was ratified in 1868. It did not exist at the time that Article II was ratified in 1787. The 14th amendment does NOT refer to, or alter the meaning of Article II in ANY way, whatever one thinks that the framers meant for Article II to accomplish.
Harris’s birth status is identical to Wong Kim Ark. She was born in CA to two lawfully resident non citizen parents. She is NOT an Article II eligible Natural Born Citizen. She is a citizen at birth by virtue of the 14th amendment. I believe that Indian and Jamaican law make her a citizen of their countries too, as does US law under the Immigration and Naturalization Act which makes a person born to ANY US citizen ANYWHERE in the world a US citizen too.
It strains credulity to think that the framers of Article II, section one, clause 5 in 1787, INTENDED that at any time in the future, absent an amendment to allow for same, that a foreign citizen by birth would be eligible for the office of POTUS and VPOTUS.
None of the framers or founders were NBC. Most of them were born British subjects. They had to establish a grandfather clause by way of Article II, Section one, clause 5 to qualify themselves.
Our citizenship laws are similar to theirs. Our laws no more invalidate theirs then theirs do ours. It is a well recognized and mutually accepted international principle to allow recognition for such laws.
How is the anchor baby Commie-La more “privileged” then the framers were, who were most of them born as British subjects?
Our overlords have decided that this is not an issue worth examining by adjudication. Constitutionalists know that the NBC requirement is designed to protect the office of POTUS from undue foreign influence, and it is worth observing, especially against an Anti-American opportunist like Harris.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.