Posted on 10/21/2020 5:53:47 PM PDT by ransomnote
What, me worry?
Huh, really?
Even with your pimped out, drug addicted son and lip smacking pics, of you and your granddaughter out there, everywhere?
Okeee.
True, about the same, from my past experience with those kind of patients.
Well, my son is in the Army and a State Trooper. My daughter is a first responder.
So, yeah, I would take her places she would never otherwise get to. The same way I took my kids to places they wouldnt have gotten to if my company wasnt paying the bill.
You clearly never got paid to go anywhere cool.
Probably thought he was on hachikun
S. 2661, the National Suicide Hotline Designation Act of 2020,
Timing is interesting. My guess is that this will be needed by the derps the weekend of Halloween .... their high holy day for sacrificing (this year maybe a lot of their own because of their failure). Just a guess.
Bondservant
From beyond the trees, “Weekend at Biden’s”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qu6PH9E5jiA&feature=youtu.be
She sees no good outcome for herself; thus like all bad pepople just doubles down until the end.
And, I wasnt talking about you. I was talking about Creepy and Humper.
I suppose so. There seemed to be some indication that she was cooperating but I guess not. Same with Lisa Page. When she testified to Congress she was described as cooperative. Her behavior since then has shown that to not be the case.
Yeah. Especially if you have that "Special" relationship with her.
Thats what I dont get, either. How does Biden show up, unless a UUGE bear trap has been set up, for this event.
~~~~~~~~~~~
I think they were desperate to avoid another debate and hoped their “cut the microphone” rule would prevent Trump from attending. Given Trump’s guest, it’s possible they had invited Stormy Daniels or some other “guest”. If not, I’m guessing they have done so now.
I’m wondering if President Trump wants to expose the Dems a little more by having the public witness them cutting him off, cutting him off, cutting him off....I don’t think it’s been done before and if he’s talking about the Biden scandals it will only emphasize the “speech control” the Dems have in mind for us all, just as people like Newsom are giving us dictatorial “rules” for Thanks Giving.
I know it’s far-fetched, but it would be just outrageously awesome if Trump had not only Tony but a freshly-flipped Hunter show up, sitting together between a couple of burly SS agents.
I wonder if you could complain to the State Department or the FBI that a foreign power was publishing your name for nefarious reasons. Get that sh!t shut down.
ThankQ for posting - good catch!
After reading that he looked up the word "Quelle". He got as far as the Wikileaks link -
Q source From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search The "Two-source Hypothesis" proposes that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written independently, each using Mark and a second hypothetical document called "Q" as a source. Q was conceived as the most likely explanation behind the common material (mostly sayings) found in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke but not in Mark. The Q source (also called Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's oral tradition.[1][2][3] Along with Marcan priority, Q was hypothesized by 1900, and is one of the foundations of most modern gospel scholarship.[4] B. H. Streeter formulated a widely accepted view of Q: that it was written in Koine Greek; that most of its contents appear in Matthew, in Luke, or in both; and that Luke more often preserves the text's original order than Matthew. In the two-source hypothesis, the three-source hypothesis and the Q+/Papias hypothesis, Matthew and Luke both used Mark and Q as sources. Some scholars have postulated that Q is actually a plurality of sources, some written and some oral.[5] Others have attempted to determine the stages in which Q was composed.[6] Q's existence has been questioned.[6] Omitting what should have been a highly treasured dominical document from all early Church catalogs, its lack of mention by Jerome is a conundrum of modern Biblical scholarship.[7] But copying Q might have been seen as unnecessary as it was preserved in the canonical gospels. Hence, it was preferable to copy the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, "where the sayings of Jesus from Q were rephrased to avoid misunderstandings, and to fit their own situations and their understanding of what Jesus had really meant".[8] Despite challenges, the two-source hypothesis retains wide support.[6]
there is more at the link for those interested. Just had to post this. This was the opposite of a dig for surehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
Good meme!
Historical Criticism
Now look. Just now on MSDNC, Peter Strok, valued political analyst, spouting orange man bad stuff. With no shame or guilt, full of arrogance and hubris.
Please cuff him, the last place we need him is on TV with a megaphone.
I still maintain, what ever strategic advantage there might have beem to waiting for timing or the right moment, these evil deep staters have caused much more damage.
Justice delayed is justice denied remains true
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.