[bagster]

I never understood this line of thinking. Can someone explain it to me?

Q is saying that the derps use the cockamamie and goofiest of theories discussed by anons and all Q researches as a bludgeon of ridicule to 'debunk' the entirety of Q.

In this case, the JFK Jr. is alive crock of dooky.

And that's also why they lead with, "Will you debunk the Qanon theory that says democrats are all satanic pedophiles that eat babies?".

We see that even on our beloved FR from the wanna be Q debunkers that infest the place like so much fungi (see what I did there?) beyond the trees.

[Vermont Lt]

Thanks. All of the anti Q crap comes from people who have no idea of how the internet works. It’s almost like watching a congressional testimony with old Reps. They just don’t “understand.”

And the reporters who talk about this stuff—they think “texting” is using the Internet.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Keep in mind that, over here on the FReeQ thread, when some Anon asked about JFKjr, we collectively said “not this sh*t again!”
We were quite happy that Q slapped the question away with a simple, “No”

Moving on...

[kevao]

bagster,

Did you guys really bump off that Gambino family boss? And here I thought you Q guys just sat around in front of the computer all day!