Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric
"Or the engineers #’d up — happens."

I'm not sure that was so much the case with the Fiero. For the American auto industry, the mid-engine layout was new territory at the time, and the first year or so had some real problems with engine cooling. This was quickly resolved, but also arose from those backing the car being forced to use GM off-the-shelf parts for cost savings.

The performance was deliberately kept toned down throughout its life because GM Execs didn't want it to outshine that *other* two seater built by Chevy, or the Camaro or Trans Am for that matter.

With the right choices of engine, transmission and suspension, this little rocket could have been a world class performer, but was cancelled just as they were starting to get it right.

5 posted on 10/09/2020 3:44:40 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

Fair enough. I’ll do my homework regarding the Fiero. It’s been a while.

Scraped my knuckles up until the mid 80s. They latter years weren’t good years for US auto manufacturing.


10 posted on 10/09/2020 3:53:07 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Joe 6-pack

A friend of mine owned one and loved it. Then the engine blew and was not repairable. Goodby Fiero.


16 posted on 10/09/2020 4:07:06 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson