Does it say that in the ruling? I heard on the 10 o’clock news she claimed she was going to maintain the boot heel on the necks of Michiganders for the next 21 days. How can the SC rule that she illegally usurped authority and then say, “but she has 21 days to carry on illegally.” I do not intend to wear my mask in public from this point on.
A ruling of “Unconstitutional” should nullify the orders after April 30 immediately...or at least when the clerk of the court (SCOSM) registers and signs the decision.
Should that take 21 days?
There are sun-orders enacted by localities that are still in effect.
Why, since they look to the Guv’z EO for authority?
The ruling tosses everything back to the Legislature who are a bunch of cowering simps.
They will need to pass something DuhGov will not veto.
Don’t they have a veto-proof majority in one house?