Posted on 10/02/2020 7:09:57 AM PDT by Red Badger
But then the power is converted back into heat. So then our energy balance works, but what motivates the heat to go through all this bullshit without a net thermal gradient between points A & B? Or potentially, even a counter-gradient, if B is hotter than A? It’s like a ball rolling around perpetually on level ground.
Conservation of energy said to be conserved over time. This law, first proposed and tested by Émilie du Châtelet, means that energy can neither be created nor destroyed;
Conservation of energy said to be conserved over time. This law, first proposed and tested by Émilie du Châtelet, means that energy can neither be created nor destroyed;
Good question. You are correct of course. All I can say is that it must be some sort of Graphene Magic.
Despite my explanation I too am skeptical. But its worth watching.
Yeah, except that I didn’t watch the experiment in person, so I’m obliged to apply logic in evaluating the likelihood of the results. Don’t forget the “fusion on a table” guys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.