Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mbrfl; bagster

:: Some of the knowledge Q has may not be admissible in a civilian trial, ::

Good post and the above portion brought to mind that everything Q dropped is open sourced.
If any of it was a criminal act, it would not be available.
It is the compendium of evidence found in these that can /lead/ us to understand there is an underlying, nefarious and likely criminal conspiracy.
Hive mind.


445 posted on 09/27/2020 11:05:46 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Some of the things Q has revealed are based on classified information. But the classified information itself is never revealed. As an example, Q has told us that a recording exists of Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch’s tarmac meeting, but the recording itself hasn’t been released.

I’d be interested to know whether simply revealing the recording’s existence is technically illegal. I’m assuming not. I assume Q has taken great care to avoid doing anything that would legally jeopardize the operation.


452 posted on 09/27/2020 11:20:16 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson