Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kalam

But, in order to be vigilant, one must know and ACTIVELY use the right or be subject to losing it.

And now we know.
Miranda Rights aren’t just pretty words to say.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tRgYfQ48A0


1,005 posted on 09/28/2020 4:53:26 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 959 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Miranda was totally made up out of whole cloth. There is no obligation to warn a criminal defendant not to confess in the US Constitution. That was a policy decision from the SC in the mid-60s.

The Constitution says that a defendant can’t be forced to testify against himself. And, prior to Miranda, there was a long body of cases on confessions and whether they were voluntary or not. Police can’t force a confession out of a suspect, and they were not known for being scrupulous about ensuring that defendants were not coerced into a confession. But the Constitution didn’t require Miranda and its specific requirements.


1,105 posted on 09/28/2020 8:05:11 PM PDT by Defiant (Does anyone really think that the people creating a police state don't want police?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson