1905 case president is not a God’s ruling in stone. There are many cases that were flat out wrong, Constitutionally, throughout history.
My understanding is that Barret is an originalist with strong interest in stare decisis. I’m hoping that she will look at past precedent and have the guts to say “That’s a bad precedent. That’s not what the Founders wanted. We need to ignore that old decision, and decide our current case more correctly.”