Posted on 09/26/2020 5:05:47 AM PDT by MtnClimber
On Thursday, in his continued effort to get his case dismissed, Michael Flynn filed a third brief supporting the original dismissal claim. This made waves because it included texts between FBI analysts in which they admitted that they knew the investigation against Michael Flynn was unfounded and driven by partisan animus. The text messages might have revealed more than that: One texter confessed that those involved bought professional liability insurance after becoming afraid that news might leak about their conduct. They might have committed insurance fraud if they didn’t let the insurance companies know they had already committed wrongful acts.
There are multiple types of insurance fraud. Most people are familiar with cases in which people committed arson against their property or even murdered someone to collect insurance.
Another form of insurance fraud takes place at the time of purchase. Insurance exists to cover against possible future incidents. A person cannot buy insurance to cover a known past incident. That’s not insurance; that’s just cost-shifting. If someone knowingly and intentionally “forgets” to tell the insurance company about an existing claim, and then seeks to recover on it, that’s an actionable fraud. Indeed, it’s a two-tiered fraud because there’s fraud in both the purchase and the claim.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I ask that question frequently. Methinks there will be a thorough swamp cleaning after the election. POTUS now know how things really work, and how bad they are
I ask that question frequently. Methinks there will be a thorough swamp cleaning after the election. POTUS now know how things really work, and how bad they are
How did they pay for the insurance ??
Hmmmmmm ?
Impeach judge Emmet (disgusting little insect) Sullivan.
If the Flynn case had already been dismissed by Sullivan, would this info been discovered and released?
Which ins company was involved?
“It’s not wrondoing unless you get caught.”
“It’s not the evidence, but the seriousness of the chatges.”
The left in its shameless slime.
“the application would ask if there are any incidents they are aware of that could cause a claim, if they answered no they have committed fraud.”
Of course one would have to be able to prove the intent to commit fraud - to crawl behind each and every application. Practically speaking, there would be no reason to investigate an application’s veracity until the claim was made. The insurance company is all too glad to accept the premium payments with a big smile without “investing” in the cost of detailed investigating of every application for fraud before a claim is made. I won’t leave out the possibility with technology today they might have a rapid, low cost screening process on the individual. They will instead send the insured friendly premium due reminders or help them to set up auto-draft payments. Once a claim is made, they will protect their interests and investigate according to an internal criteria/checklist for spotting fraud.
And now we are dealing with the FBI. Until Judge Sullivan’s actual stupidity in (not) quickly dismissing the Flynn case, these revelations have made the insurance companies’ job much easier in the fraud department for these individuals. I remain skeptical the insurance company would have been able to penetrate fortress FBI to get at these cell phone records in the process of verifying the these agents’ applications.
I have not heard what company, I am just speculating like the rest of us.
Liz you are the most informed person I know. God Bless.
Why is Christopher Wray still Director
———
Protect the swamp.
Day 1 after Re election clean house starting with him.
Another “ pretty boy” smarmy fake put in place by senate to protect their illegalities
Hopefully, my posts will make every FReeper well-informed
George Costanza... It’s not a lie Jerry if you believe it’s true...
Preexisting fraud liability coverage.
Ahhhh. The old Nuremberg defense. Third time I have seen it this week.
Anyone know who this brave employee gave an interview / deposition to?
Haven’t heard that specific on any news channel ?
Seems like a true named “ whistleblower “ to me unlike Schiff phantoms
Only little people get charged with something like that.
It seems to me, that in buying the insurance these perps have confessed that EVERYTHING they’ve done; from the “meeting in Andy’s office” on through the appointment of Mueller and his $25+ million farcical investigation, and everything in between and since then, had no predicate whatever, other than a severe case of TDS, which includes acute red@$$ in all involved.
Pfffffft, in the list of bad deeds by the alphabets this amounts to a pimple on a gnats ass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.