Posted on 09/25/2020 4:30:23 PM PDT by Rummyfan
Meghan Markle harbors serious ambitions to run for president of the United States, according to a report.
After the Duchess of Sussex and husband Prince Harry dumped royal duties with their historic Megxit this year, the 39-year-old former “Suits” star now has her eye on the White House, a close friend told Vanity Fair.
“One of the reasons she was so keen not to give up her American citizenship was so she had the option to go into politics,” the unidentified friend told the mag.
“I think if Meghan and Harry ever gave up their titles she would seriously consider running for president,” the friend added of rumors of a 2024 run.
Her biographer, Omid Scobie, also previously claimed that the former actress “has her eyes set on the US presidency.”
“Meghan is the embodiment of the American dream. One day we may see Meghan become president,” the author of “Finding Freedom: Harry, Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family” previously told a documentary, Vanity Fair said.
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
NO Royals in the White House. We fought a revolution to get out from under the British Crown.
Poor Harry my ass.
This stoopid chump use to be a mans man.
Former attack helicopter pilot.
Now he is little more than Meghans little boy toy bitch.
She would fall for Kim Jong Un dropping a pencil, bending way over to pick it up for him while Kim rogers her dodger.Gullible, smug, emotive and just about as tough as a wet noodle.
Yep, vote for Presidemnt Markle today.
Laws will be passed making a compulsory daily hug with your neighbor in the name of the Markle liberal fascist Utopia.
My goodness girl I had to do a lot reading! LOL
In a English accent too!
Parliament did indeed approve of the Succession Act, however the Queen assented and permitted it to go through on April 25, 2013. It was really an Act to give some clarity to the Perth Agreement and tweak the Law regarding Marriage approval and marrying a Catholic (for “In-Lines only)
Parliament can revoke a Title, if the holder is deemed an enemy of the State. The Crown can also revoke titles as King/Queen sees fit, but neither can revoke a title if the holder is deceased.
George the V removed the titles of 3 Dukes and one Viscount because they were also Officers in the German military. WW1 brought on some changes. The Act of 1917 for one.
Royal titles can be removed, however, it is rare and has not been seen in decades.
British peerages and royal titles can be taken away under the Titles Deprivation Act 1917.
This Act of Parliament authorised enemies of the United Kingdom during the First World War to be deprived of their British peerages and royal titles.
The British Royal Family was closely related to many of the royal and princely families of Germany.
In particular, when Victoria became Queen in 1837, the Kingdom of Hanover, which had been in personal union with the British crown for over a century, passed to her uncle the Duke of Cumberland, who also retained his British titles and princely rank.
Queen Victoria similarly married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, whose German titles passed to the descendants of their youngest son Leopold, Duke of Albany.
Anyway RummyChick, it appears we have a draw. You are correct mostly, and I believe I’m correct mostly........but thanks for getting me thinkin’ it was a nice diversion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.