Posted on 09/22/2020 7:21:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
HERE’s THE ANALOGY THAT Jason Kaelber, a Rutgers University virologist uses:
“It’s like seeing the blessed virgin in a piece of toast, the restriction sites that she finds are commonly occurring elsewhere in Sars-Cov-2 and in other related viruses and if you were to engineer in restriction sites to manipulate the spike gene, I certainly wouldn’t do it like that, there’s much better ways to do that,”
They HAVE to debunk it.
IF it ever gets out, with proof, that the Left colluded with the CCP on a deliberate man-made virus release, the repercussions will be totally disastrous for both the domestic and CCP communists. There’d be public hangings and rightly so.
This is the scientist that “ hasn’t even gone looking” because these things happen in nature all the time...
Yikes.
What their MOTIVES are is irrelevant.
The issue is this -— Is the SARS-COV-2 *DESIGNED* or is it a naturally occurring virus?
Dr. Li Meng-Yan argues based on her SCIENTIFIC observation that the features look DESIGNED. And Dr. Yan’s observations are not even uniquely her own.
Dr. Nikolai Petrovsky, one of Australia’s leading Molecular Biologist, and whose lab is developing a vaccine for Covid-19, makes a similar observations as her. See here:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8356751/How-COVID-19s-unique-structure-means-man-made.html
TITLE: No known animal host and ‘almost perfect’ human adaption: Top Australian vaccine scientist reveals how COVID-19’s unique structure means it’s either man-made - or a ‘complete fluke’ of nature.
So, These virologists beg to differ.
The argument then has to be decided SCIENTIFICALLY. What a person’s motives are for supporting or debunking the study is another matter altogether.
RE: From Jason Kaelber: “if you were to engineer in restriction sites to manipulate the spike gene, I certainly wouldn’t do it like that, there’s much better ways to do that,”
Just because He would not do it like that doesn’t mean that other scientists won’t do such an experimentation. What he would do and what others would do are not scientific arguments.
Some think the virus was designed to kill old people,to bring down the costs of the support of old people.
I’ll read this. I d/l her paper and saw the Tucker interview live.
RE: Some think the virus was designed to kill old people,to bring down the costs of the support of old people.
I’m not interested in motives. I am interested in SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS — whether or not the virus was man-made or naturally occurring.
After we have established the former ( e.g. it was man-made ), we can have jolly good time determining and understanding WHAT it was designed but not until.
“One reason why I haven’t gone looking for explanations of artificial origins is because we knew something like this was going to happen sooner or later,” he continued... ADMITTING HE HASN’T EVEN RESEARCHED THIS POSSIBILITY!
What a lazy attempt to debunk... It’s a fake article.
For those interested in delving into the science ( if you can understand it ), Doctor Li-Meng Yan, a scientist who studied some of the available data on COVID-19 has fled China and published her claims on Zenodo, an open access digital platform. This link below hosts the content of her scientific paper. It is not hidden and OPEN for all to read and critique.
She wrote that she believed COVID-19 could have been “conveniently created” within a lab setting over a period of just six months, and “SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus”.
https://zenodo.org/record/4028830
So this stooge is claiming to debunk what so many other scientists have said while purposely not looking at or considering the evidence.
Yes, I wonder if Jason Kaelber is a politicized Leftist with ties to the money and ideology to defend the CCP and Marxists?
I notice that these virologists never use math or statistics to argue what is common or uncommon in the wild. How can we trust that their opinions are anything more than a hunch? One thing we can take from this, regardless of who is actually correct about this coronavirus, is that virologists need more training in statistics to properly assess pandemics. It’s their job!
I still think the release of Covid 19 was the result of a lab accident.
If it were deliberate it would have been much more severe, and directly released in the target country like a biological attack, probably through a front group (Islamic terror group like ISIS or Hezbollah).
The article title is a little misleading. They are misrepresenting the US virologists.
Whittaker only points out yes the virus could happen in nature using the Cat cornonavirus as an example. This is not a dispute of it being man made.
I found this near the bottom of the article.
“ he said it’s too early to completely rule out the potential of it being man made.”
“I still think the release of Covid 19 was the result of a lab accident.”
I think you are right. The CCP cover it up, they do not like to admit failure. Plus the fact there would be huge law suites.
Probably Correct. However, the Chinese knew they would take an economic hit from it and thus exported it to the world. In effect this was an act of bio warfare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.