Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Judiciary Committee hearings should be virtual. On Zoom. For safety reasons. Haha.
09/21/2020 | self

Posted on 09/21/2020 1:01:39 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas

The SCOTUS Judiciary Committee hearings should be virtual. On Zoom. You know, for everyone's safety. Social distancing and all that. DEMs can't bring protesters into the room. No room full of hostile media. Harris and Feinstein can't grandstand on Zoom. The hearings will be so boring on Zoom, no one will watch. Haha. You know for everyone's safety with Covid-19.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Did I say, Haha.
1 posted on 09/21/2020 1:01:39 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ravi; LS

ping


2 posted on 09/21/2020 1:01:51 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas (Localization, not Globalization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

That’s not a bad idea. Though witnesses should still be deposed in person. You know that no matter who the nominee is, the Dims will find someone to make up a story. Or do as Rush proposes...


3 posted on 09/21/2020 1:04:25 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Zoom wouldn’t work, our prima donna Senators and Representatives would never agree to a mute function.


4 posted on 09/21/2020 1:06:17 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Joe Biden: Showing his leadership by cowering in the basement like a scared child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Not a bad idea.
Hang the Dems by their own petard.


5 posted on 09/21/2020 1:07:41 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Most importantly, set a limit for debate. Next week and then a vote the following Monday.


6 posted on 09/21/2020 1:08:32 PM PDT by 1Old Pro (evience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Take the grandstanding stage right out from under the dastardly Dems. Great idea.


7 posted on 09/21/2020 1:09:48 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

They need to just vote on the nominee.

There is nothing in the Constitution that says hearings must be held.


8 posted on 09/21/2020 1:09:52 PM PDT by SgtBob (Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lakecumberlandvet

Great idea keeps the moonbats out of the hearing room audience.


9 posted on 09/21/2020 1:11:12 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Hey, everyone who hates Gender reveal parties? Trump’s going to have a gender reveal party on Friday or Saturday.

Its a Girl.


10 posted on 09/21/2020 1:11:47 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas (Localization, not Globalization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

I think it’s better to have the crazies come in and trash the candidate in person b/c that will make a lot of people angry and create more Trump voters.


11 posted on 09/21/2020 1:14:55 PM PDT by salmon76 (You can vote your way into socialism, but you'll have to shoot your way out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtBob
Prior to 1968, there were no hearings. A group of senators from the majority and minority interviewed the judicial candidate and reported back to the committee.

In 1968, LBJ attempted to move Justice Abe Fortas, his longtime political fixer, into Earl Warren's Chief Justice slot and move Homer Thornberry, another friend, into Fortas' slot. Everett Dirksen, the Republican minority leader, teamed with southern Democrats to prevent the departing LBJ from packing the Court with his liberal cronies. His tool was a committee hearing designed to bring out the dirt on the two candidates are keep the Warren slot open for Richard Nixon to fill. It worked.

Later, Fortas was forced off the Court when his involvement with crooked financier Leonard Wolfson became public.

12 posted on 09/21/2020 1:17:23 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Harris might want it so she can continue campaigning as she is on the Judiciary Committee.


13 posted on 09/21/2020 1:34:28 PM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SgtBob
“They need to just vote on the nominee.

There is nothing in the Constitution that says hearings must be held.”

Absolutely

14 posted on 09/21/2020 1:34:56 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck ("Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

I think the Democrats’ attacks work for Republicans at the ballot box, especially as deranged And extreme as their actions are right now.


15 posted on 09/21/2020 1:40:20 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Put them on C-Span so everyone can watch without a special download or app!!


16 posted on 09/21/2020 1:46:13 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

No way...make every senator sit there and sweat before the cameras.


17 posted on 09/21/2020 2:09:41 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Post 3- I disagree.
Make everyone be in the same room for the testimony and hearing my members of the committee.


18 posted on 09/21/2020 2:10:35 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

“SCOTUS Judiciary Committee hearings should be virtual. On Zoom. For safety reasons. Haha.”

haha is right ... but nice try anyway ...


19 posted on 09/21/2020 2:46:26 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Great. No more screeching protesters in the room. Grassley should have cleared the gallery after the second outburst.


20 posted on 09/21/2020 3:17:14 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson