[ransomnote]

Focus on content [information]. Research for yourself. gatekeeper noun a person that controls access, as to information, often acting as an arbiter of quality or legitimacy: an open internet allows innovators to bypass traditional gatekeepers and promote their work on its own merit. a guardian; monitor Deploy camouflage. Drop all references re: 'Q' 'Qanon' etc. to avoid ban/termination _censorship install. Algos [sniffers] bypass. Keep charging, Midnight Riders! [Revere's 'Midnight' Ride] Delivery of free-information. [bypass controlled media narrative].

I know the instruction was meant for Youtube/Twitter/Facebook. But I'm not sure it wouldn't be useful to us, too. When we venture into the forum, we focus on content and not the 17th letter.

We haven't faced censorship; but as other venues focus on content and not "the letter" I wonder if we become the "nail that needs to be hammered down". Maybe it wouldn't work for us; maybe it would.

Focus on the content not the letter we engage peeps on the field of content alone- but how to do so without losing our thread's effectiveness in resolving and analyzing information?

How to do so without an influx of "DOOM! DOOM! DOOM!" visitors?

How to stay together?

Just wondering if there's an opportunity there, or not. :)

[bagster]

Just wondering if there's an opportunity there, or not. :)

Oh, okay. Now I get it.

When I go beyond the trees, I TRY to focus on the information. I'll even post Q posts without the codes and Q signature. Or I'll post stuff that I got here or from Q research. Or my analysis of issues based on knowledge gained from studying Q. That does seem to work.

But then, I'm pretty well known for being a Qtard because I'm kinda aggressive, so I'll get blasted with TRUST SESSIONS and the usual tripe. Also, the tards like to blast on Q without opposition, of which I'm often eager to provide.

If they can talk about Q, then so can I, is what I say.

[ichabod1]

They’re just talking about Facebook and Twitter. I don’t think it means discussion groups have to stop using it. It’s just that you can make a lot of memes without the kew on them and make the same point and not get censored.

[greeneyes]

Focus on the content not the letter we engage peeps on the field of content alone- but how to do so without losing our thread’s effectiveness in resolving and analyzing information?
How to do so without an influx of “DOOM! DOOM! DOOM!” visitors?
How to stay together?

Just wondering if there’s an opportunity there, or not. :)
*************************************************************************************
We are fine as is. We discuss Q on the thread. Those who wish go out to the forum and post on stuff of interest—leaving our favorite letter out of the conversation.

Seems to me what we have been doing all along.