Speculating about assassination of an "inconvenient" SCOTUS Justice says nothing good about us or our movement.
We're better than that.
TXnMA
Definitely not speculating on assassination.
Execution is NOT assassination.
Speculating is NOT the same as hoping / wishing / preferring.
*IF* - and it’s a big IF - either RBG or no name - or anyone else - was executed, I believe/hope/wish/prefer/speculate it would have been after a fair trial.
Furthermore, my personal position is against capital punishment. So I am hardly one to be hoping that this was the case. But to refuse to consider it as a possibility would be turning a blind eye to the coincidence of the Q posts exactly 1 month / 2 years prior to their death announcements.
RBG was not merely “inconvenient”. There is some evidence (though not (yet) proof) that she was traitorous. If you look at her public positions on underage sex and abortion, those are, in the eyes of many, crimes against humanity. And IMO it begs the question that if those are her public opinions, what might her private actions have been?
Most on this board, myself included, think it is highly likely that CJ Roberts has been blackmailed on certain SCOTUS votes. If that is true about Roberts, then might that not be true of others on SCOTUS? And if so, what is/was being held over them as blackmail.
There are more questions than answers here. But the bottom line is that nothing I posted was a suggestion that anyone was assassinated.
Putting words into someone else’s mouth is a leftwing tactic. We’re better than that.