Posted on 09/11/2020 5:03:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Machine learning can help maggots solve crimes Trained algorithms can identify maggots and read clues like time of death
Maggots dont have fingers, but they do produce chemical fingerprints a blend of chemicals unique to their species. Different maggot species feed on corpses at particular stages of decay. Forensics teams actually use this information to estimate a persons time of death. The problem is that maggots, which are immature flies, are tricky to identify and rearing them to flyhood is time-consuming and expensive.
University of Albany researchers developed a machine learning technique to rapidly distinguish maggot species by their chemical fingerprints.
Because maggots collected at a crime scene are usually an assortment of many species, the team trained their computer program with mixtures of various combinations of six fly species. The researchers deciphered the chemical signatures of each maggot melange with a technique called mass spectrometry, which identifies chemicals on the basis of size and charge.
After teaching the program to recognize the chemical makeup of each training mixture, the researchers assessed whether it could identify test maggot blends. The program accurately identified most of the test samples, suggesting that this technique could help forensic detectives establish time of death, a critical clue for solving crimes. The results are published in a recent issue of Analytical Chemistry.
Talk about your poorly written headlines, there...
I wonder if the maggots have little badges?
So if the democrats win, machine learning could help them bust sell outs like Biden and Hillary?
The Maggiof made me do it !!
In the 2002 trial of David Westerfield for the murder of Danielle van Dam, four forensic experts all estimated that the flies most probably only laid their eggs (from which the maggots developed on her body) several days after he was placed under round-the-clock police surveillance. And flies normally find a body and lay their eggs on it within minutes or hours after death. That was the opinion not only of the two experts hired by the defense, but also of the expert hired by the police (who testified for the defense), and even of the expert hired by the prosecution and who testified for the prosecution. So this is strong evidence that he couldnt have killed her. But the jury found him guilty anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.