Posted on 08/21/2020 12:29:05 AM PDT by ransomnote
if you are talking about “...esq”...he’s now banned or suspended
That's nice. Why did you tell me that.
#NonSequiter
p.s. It's Scot.
There’s a process for these investigations. They start with the guy they get and then work up. If he’s looking for a plea deal, he signs a cooperation agreement and starts talking. Depending on the value of what he offers and whether he’s truthful, the deal stays in place or it can be pulled - just recall how it worked with Flynn. They squeeze and cross-check testimony from each person they interview, always looking for others who may have committed crimes. Clinesmith is near the bottom of the pile.
So until they actually talk to someone that person may not be a target, but depending on what they say that may change. It’s a stepwise process because of the presumption of innocence and you’d have to be a dope to tip your hand before the person is interviewed.
That said, the higher up you go in any organization, the more deniability and wiggle room the person has. And since the people at the top are the end of the chain, responsibility-wise, they have less ability to make deals because there are few if any above them that they can give up. Presumably anything they can offer about people below them is already known through previous interviews.
This is why it’s a time-consuming process.
No one is going to rat out Obama, that’s obvious. In fact if things really get heated I’d expect even Comey to fall on his sword to protect Obama. Brennan surely would, he’d figure he’d get some virgins out of the deal.
That Brennan thread about made me puke. Those snivel-bots are frikkin suicidal.
I am disgust at my fellow FReepers.
And you got called a troll by the biggest negative nancypants on FR.
Hahahahahahahaha.
p.s. I thought you went to bed.
*******************************************************************************
I missed that thread—got a link?
Tell me about it.
ANY mama worth her bra straps should go into a tasmanian devil rage when somebody messes with their kid.
What happened to toxic femininity?
That’s nice. Why did you tell me that.
**************************************************************************
Because you typed this:
Not a target?
Negro please.
*******************
And at MY house they always said SCOTTs or SCOTCH.
No MAGA hats
No Blue Lives Matter Flags
No Rednecks
I am not sure about this tactic as shill flag, just not sure.
I been known to post some big images, but not on porpoise
it might be lack of HMTL skilts by good doers.
Wrongo, Clouseu.
Target of the investigation, suspect, person of interest are basically the exact same thing. 'Person of interest' came into vogue because 'suspect' was too mean sounding.
It has nothing to do with 'framing'.
But it does have something to do with the legal obligation to read the 'target' his Miranda rights.
That's about it.
Not a lawyer, but I did stay in my comfy bed last night.
DUH-do you really think I don’t know all that?
Here’s the explanation I wrote to bagster about the point I was trying to make:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3876326/posts?page=592#592
A short play on words—
Why do you turn everything into an argument of right or wrong.
You just don’t get my humor—it was a play on words. Gheez!
Probably a decade, and a couple hundred pounds ago.
But last year yahoo reported in a leaked FBI memo from an Arizona FBI office that it could be a threat. Repeat this repeat this. Warning some early bad language.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt9c0UeYhFc
I hope that’s right. He was posting on August 21 right up until 3 pm. Hope that’s not a fakery on his home page.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3876623/posts
Try not to throw up at the start. It gets better toward the end.
Thanks.
Careful, that topic got me in hot water.
Unless you’re discussing high-end folks “flipping”...
Two of Larry Kings children have died in the past three weeks
Oh. No, I was talking to Brennan on that one.
Saying basically that him not being a target is obviously laughable.
And at MY house they always said SCOTTs or SCOTCH.
Both are wrong. Let's have WildHighlander weigh in. I'd ping him but I can't remember his full name.
Let's have a side bet.
One 'T' and 'Scotch' is insuslting to a true Scotsman.
Let the flame wars begin!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.