Much like the argument about “natural born”, this argument is a non starter. If they want to call her “black”, I guess that is up to her.
I tend not to look at skin color in stuff. The whole “content of their character” thing really does ring true. And it doesn’t work in her favor.
I’m not suggesting that her racial makeup is of any consequence. At least not to me. I’m curious because if it is true it simply dovetails with all the other Democrat hypocrisy regarding identity politics and race. They are the racists, they pound the race drum day after day.
They are making her skin color her primary qualification. By doing that they make her racial background relevant in the sense that it disqualifies their argument.
Vermont: “content of their character” —> exactly. And if we spend too much time talking about “natural born”, we divert attention from that