Posted on 08/16/2020 3:29:38 AM PDT by RandFan
Alex Jones & Greg Reese give updates on the status of Millie Weaver's arrest
This was not staged.
Alex also says there is a CPS hearing Monday to take her kids!
WTF!!
Video...
(Excerpt) Read more at banned.video ...
Here; a cleaned up, non-mobile link to her father’s tweet
https://twitter.com/WeaverPastor/status/1294373140668338177
Yours was giving a link credit to Russia Times and rt.com
Everything including and after the question mark can be removed from most links. It helps reduce people being tracked in some cases and removes the origin website getting credit. Half the time the origin site is msm, google etc aka the enemy.
Removed the https:// below to deactivate it as a link but to show what I removed, ? and everything after. That stuff is apt to set unnecessary cookies in your browser, some of which can be tracking cookies.
mobile.twitter.com/WeaverPastor/status/1294373140668338177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1294373140668338177%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fusa%2F498072-millie-weaver-documentary-arrest-shadowgate%2F
All FReepers should learn this. 9 times out of 10, a question mark is used to start the added junk so that’s your starting point in cleaning up the url.
“Bookmark.”
Don’t forget to tip them! Banned.video and Bitchute need our support to keep operating.
Thanks so much for the tip!
Ping ping
If you see the ? and fb in the junk text after .html in a link, it’s a sign that Facebook tracking is attached, which alerts hundreds of other trackers (google, amazon, ad trackers) to your identity, the persons who posted it, and the place you posted it.
Always remove the fb links.
Always.
If you do a search on her you’ll find she came up with a conspiracy theory that the deep state was trying to get rid of Trump!?!
LOL!
So she invented the fact that Russia Gate was a hoax. These guys think we are idiots!
Yes, very much so. She went from “nearly disbarred and lost her job and career” to “fully reinstated.”
I assume that came with heavy strings, as in, “Some day we’re going to ask you to do us a favor.”
And over a 3-day weekend, the serious “men in black” in suits with fake IDs from non-existent agencies will have plenty of time to psyop them both, scare the shit out of them, etc.
That’s why they were arrested friday afternoon. Non of this was random.
We could have written that slant in our sleep five minutes after they were arrested.
Hell, it was probably written for them BEFORE they were arrested.
There's very little known about Millie Weaver's arrest, but Millie is a member of a private chat group w/ former DNI @RichardGrenell where members signal-boost each other's pro-Trump misinformation efforts, so please take what you read w/ a grain of salt. pic.twitter.com/2JTBh45IF7— The Sparrow Project (@sparrowmedia) August 15, 2020
And they do this while Trump and Barr are nominally in charge.
Imagine what they will do under biden-HARRIS and an AG like Holder or Lynch, with a guy like Comey back at FBI.
Should just be the initial arraignment, where she (and anyone else listening in court) will learn of the actual charges and the bail amount.
They HAVE to hold the hearing on Monday (72 hour rule), or explain the “extraordinary circumstances” that justify holding her longer.
Since these appear to be felony charges she probably won’t be asked to enter a plea at this time (not 100% sure about the rule in Ohio, so grain of salt).
If the “Victim” is refusing to cooperate, a good defense atty. should be able to get the charges dropped at the preliminary hearing, which could still be several weeks in the future at this point. Actually, a bad defense atty. should be able to get the charges dropped if the listed victim won’t cooperate.
About 10 minutes into the video. I paused it because I had a phone call and when I went back to it it said it was no longer available.
BUMP
Bookmarking
Nope. Which is why I've had my tagline for 20 years now.
her video: https://youtu.be/9HFxVvrXjCg
Imagine what they will do under biden-HARRIS and an AG like Holder or Lynch, with a guy like Comey back at FBI.
= = =
0blama/Holder on steroids.
The left-most question mark is sometimes, but not always, an indication of the boundary (between worthy portion and un-necessary portion) in the URL character string.
For example, a formal, traditional YouTube video URL address has necessary characters after the left-most question mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPCInuZjYUs
That whole string is a valid URL address, for watching a YouTube video.
The trailing (after the “=” sign) string of characters (MPCInuZjYUs), is the specific YouTube video ID.
The lone question mark, is followed, in this case, by needed characters.
You can create a shortened version of the traditional YouTube video URL address, by replacing the beginning portion of the string:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
with string:
to get:
On the other hand, many times, a URL address does have a boundary between worthy portion and un-necessary portion, and the boundary is defined by the left-most question mark.
Example FR post:
“Video: Antifa Rioters Are Being Donated Riot Gear From Out Of State Donations To Assist Them In The Civil Disturbance Against The Police And The Feds”
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3870738/posts
included a Twitter link:
The left-most (and it is a lone) question mark, is followed by some usage of HEX characters that, in each instance, follow a percent symbol.
For example, that whole URL can be re-written as:
“%2F” is a /
“%3A” is a :
“%5E” is a ^
“%7C” is a |
In this example, the left-most (and it is a lone) question mark, is followed by un-necessary characters.
So again, you only need:
https://twitter.com/livesmattershow/status/1289438920342568961
Ampersand symbols located after the left-most question mark, usually indicate a separation of variables.
The first variable after the lone question mark, is: “ref_src=” (no quotes)
The next variable to the right, immediately follows an Ampersand symbol, and is: “ref_url=” (no quotes)
When you try to figure out, what is the essential, necessary portion of a URL, test your findings, one-at-a-time, in a new browser window.
You could just start with whatever is to the left of the first lone question mark, and then add portions, in a browser window.
BTW, starting from the left . . . and finding one of these variables:
“&utm_” (no quotes)
you can cut away that Urchin Tracking Monitor (”UTM”) variable and everything to its right.
I think the point of the friday arrest was three days to put the scare into them, (plenty of visits by fearsome men in black threatening to take their kids, etc,)
Plus the pre-written news stories about domestic abuse etc, that can never be expunged from the internet.
Possibly, but taken alone, the general inefficiency of the criminal justice system could explain that.
Since posting, I’ve learned some things that don’t add up abou this caSe:
a) if it’s just a typical DV case, the DA usually moves fast, especially if there are children involved. This appears to have taken quite a long time. So, is CPS worried about the kids or not?
b) Sealed indictment for a DV caper? Huh? That’s really weird.
c) The cop mentioned burglary, but the mother mentioned robbery. The burg. charge would not apply to the DV caper the mother wrote about, but the cop mentioned burglary, not robbery. That makes one wonder if the DV caper is just tacked on and something else might be going on.
We’ll see in the morning, in any case, unless we don’t. Which would indicate something all together different is going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.