Didn't Q post to get Kamala memes ready? Or was I dreaming. I looked for the post but couldn't find it.
It would be a neat little Q proof if it wasn't a dream.
Posted on 08/09/2020 6:36:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
Thank you for posting that. The closer the feds get to Bill Gates, the better.
Didn't Q post to get Kamala memes ready? Or was I dreaming. I looked for the post but couldn't find it.
It would be a neat little Q proof if it wasn't a dream.
Isn’t it awesome that we can pick up these subtle clues thanks to Q? I know I view the news a whole lot differently, listening for a phrase or seeing something that may seem random but realizing its mathematically impossible to have so many coincidences continually occurring.
The day after tomorrow I will post memes on the memes thread nonstop. I have some saved and I'll wander around trying to collect more.
Stacey Abrams -
hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Same.
Because, despite his billions, his success in life, and his high office, he's about the most regular guy ever to be President, at least in my life time. He talks real and acts real.
I imagine we could talk to him in person like he was one of the fellas and I think he would appreciate that. And he would talk to us right back the same way.
Donald Trump ain't no phony baloney stuffed shirt.
He's one of us.
Exactly. My ears and eyes are tuned by what I have seen and heard the last fours.
LOL
I don’t watch Lou Dobbs but I agree 110% with your rant. I would say the same thing with regard to a goodly number of FReepers (who are thankfully separated by a forest) because there is nothing more illlogical than “argument from ignorance”.
Dobbs (or others unnamed) are essentially saying “Because this persons opinion cannot be proven to be false, it must be true!” Why not instead analyze the logical basis of the opinion, the evidence used to support it, the credibility of the person stating it, etc. That is “logical thinking”, and that’s what analysts or whatever Dobbs is ought to be doing. FR is a forum, much of what is posted here is opinion, and that’s fine - just don’t confuse opinion with fact.
Arguing from facts is intelligent debate, arguing from the absence of facts is a logical fallacy.
First I heard about this was a hysterical comment, paraphrasing:
“Biden had to read his statement to Kamala when he called her and had his phone upside down.
So, not bad.”
Ghislaine Maxwell is seen cavorting with fugitive rape suspect Jean-Luc Brunel - who ‘gave Jeffrey Epstein three 12-year-old sisters to abuse as a birthday present’ - in newly uncovered photos taken on ‘paedophile island’
interesting pics
Why isn't AG BARR cracking down on election interference?
I’ll have to think about that.
The Constitution says a Vice Presidential candidate must also be qualified to be President.
All I know is the recent Q drop about silence doesn’t mean inaction.
I think a helluva lot is going on under the surface that will be made public in the near future.
Exactly! Can you imagine Mark Levin saying the Durham investigation is going to be a complete whitewash based on someone’s opinion? I can’t.
-SB
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.