Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News pulls away from this video...It’s harder for us to lie to you if you see it with your own eyes
Twitter ^ | 24 July 2020 | DrScott

Posted on 07/24/2020 6:11:14 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

"Fox News pulls away from the White House press briefing after @PressSec shows a video of protests in Portland."

"We were not expecting that video, and our management here at Fox News has decided we will pull away from that at this time," @HARRISFAULKNER says

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1itwasneeded1morex; 1moretime; braking; foxnews; interceptpoint; kewordabuse; profanity; sidebarabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Here in greater Harrisburg, on Fios, Newsmax is on 615, OANN is 616 and FNC is 618. I’ll take another look at Newsmax.


101 posted on 07/25/2020 5:09:34 AM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

President Trump in an interview a few days ago expressed his disdain for Fox News, now I know why.


102 posted on 07/25/2020 5:13:20 AM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

I listen to Howie every day, while out and about on VOM, while working. haven’t had a chance to see him on newsmax yet, but hoping to get the chance!


103 posted on 07/25/2020 5:18:35 AM PDT by Bottom_Gun (Crush depth dummy - proud NRA member & Certified Instructor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
I did. You should read a bit before posting.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

The fact that you agreed with fox makes it even worse.

An f bomb during THAT news story merits it being taken of the air?

If the f bomb wasn't there but kids saw and heard a monster talking about burning down police officers homes with them inside would that be okay by you?

The left is counting on people like you to help them take down this country.

104 posted on 07/25/2020 6:50:02 AM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
NONE of the media would show THIS VIDEO DOCUMENTING THE LINK BETWEEN ANTIFA AND BLM thanks to the Chicago Police Department.

Watch and learn, it's the best <8min video you'll ever see proving BLM and ANTIFA are intricately linked together attacking the police nationwide.

105 posted on 07/25/2020 6:53:21 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps

An f bomb during THAT news story merits it being taken of the air?
+++++
I think so but that matters not. Opinions on that subject vary. But my comment was addressed at the question of why they shut it down.

I think it is Fox News policy to avoid profanity on their news feeds and the producers were just following that policy. Generally speaking, employees abide by company policies if they want to keep their jobs.

So I understand that you don’t agree with Fox News policy. Write them a letter and tell them to stop bleeping out the fowl language on their news feeds. Personally I’m glad they do that. You don’t. So we have a disagreement. Big deal. This is, after all, a forum for the exchange of ideas.


106 posted on 07/25/2020 9:35:49 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

You’ve read their policies? Please post.


107 posted on 07/25/2020 10:54:23 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Henry Hnyellar

Don’t be silly. You can do that yourself. Try Google.


108 posted on 07/25/2020 11:08:44 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

I saw that article yesterday and watched Tucker last night to see if he would mention it. Nope! He kept his mouth shut.


109 posted on 07/25/2020 3:38:51 PM PDT by Valk Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

I saw that article yesterday and watched Tucker last night to see if he would mention it. Nope! He kept his mouth shut.


110 posted on 07/25/2020 3:41:36 PM PDT by Valk Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Thanks, InterceptPoint, for helping us all really understand your point of view.

You accept "company policies" as full justification for selecting and restricting (censoring) what they are willing or allowed to cover.

Furthermore, you seem to accept that it's OK to apply those rules to breaking NEWS, equally well as to OPINION programs, without destinction.

That's actually what FAKE NEWS is, after all.

We need better sources than that for real honest news.

111 posted on 07/26/2020 2:08:04 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

You guys really don’t get it. Producers can be fired for violations of company policy. $150,000 a year and now you are on the street.

The policy itself could wrong. In this case most Freepers seem to believe that showing F***TRUMP on a Fox News broadcast is just fine. I don’t but I realize I’m in rhe minority.

But profanity on our news should not, IMHO, be normalized. If you disagree, call Fox. I was just pointing how the system works. And it does not allow producers freedom to violate company policies.

So don’t fire me and don’t fire the producer. Fire the Board of Directors at Fox News - not a bad idea actually.


112 posted on 07/26/2020 2:19:33 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Actually, I get it very well, and it has been proven repeatedly many times in the main stream media and Fox News as well.

And of course I can't "fire" you, nor would I want to.

However, I can (and do) publicly condemn Fox News, and most of Main Stream Media, for FAKE NEWS policies, and you for seeming to think they are acceptable.

113 posted on 07/26/2020 2:50:19 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

Do you object to profanity on Fox News. Would you change the policy? Do think Trimp would like to see that policy changed?

Look - you and I are 95% in agreement and you somehow think that I’m anti-Trump - or something.

I am terrified by the possibility of a Biden/Communist takeover of our country in November. As we all are. I think Trump is at least the best President since Reagan and possibly Lincoln.

Don’t over-analyze my position. I just happen to believe that profanity is not appropriate on Fox News broadcasts.


114 posted on 07/26/2020 3:36:06 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
I think you may be confused.

It was NOT "profanity on Fox News".

It also was NOT a threat to "Burn down your house with you inside" (arson and murder of "you"} from Fox News.

Both those were clearly included in an indisputable display of a video of the current rioting in Portland. The video was displayed to clarify Trump's position in protecting federal property and federal employees in Portland, as proof that these were NOT "peaceful protests", as claimed by the opposition and the Main Stream Media.

It's actually a little funny, but the complete video WAS shown on Fox News, complete with profanity and murder threats.

What was actually censored by Fox was the Press Corp reaction to the video, which did NOT contain profanity and murder threats. They must have reacted in shock, that such hard truth in opposition to the fake news they wish to support was aired in this press conference.

I simply suggest for you that if you are willing to tolerate hiding the truth (preventing it from appearing on the news) because it contains profanity, you will probably never really understand the truth.

115 posted on 07/26/2020 6:22:06 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

It was profanity on Fox News.

I watched it live and I was shocked that the Trump team would keep that segment in the clip when it could have easily been edited out. Deleting a couple of seconds would not hurt their message.

And I believe the producer would not have cut away if that edit had been made.

I don’t expect you to agree with that but it is what I think. A snap decision by a Fox News producer. Not a big conspiracy to elect a Joe Biden, just a snap decision.


116 posted on 07/26/2020 6:40:14 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Right, it could have easily been edited out. (You mean by Trump, of course). And the arson and deliberate murder threats could have been edited out as well, just as easily. And why not just edit all the other criminal acts and profane violence as well. That way, you could all have watched this "peaceful protest" in complete comfort, knowing it was all OK.

Deleting any of this simply makes the message FAKE NEWS.

Of course the cut off was a snap decision by a Fox News producer. The question is WHY.

And for whatever reason the producer did cut away, the video, including the profanity, had already been shown, and what he actually did was immediately cut off the press conference, preventing any reaction to the video from being shown.

I seriously doubt he expected the following content of the press conference would contain any profanity, so that cannot be the reason.

It has nothing to do with Joe Biden. It may, however, have everything to do with Fox News growing anti Trump stance.

117 posted on 07/26/2020 7:48:22 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Linda Tripp

We watch YouTube for free on our vizio tv. It’s how we watch the FOX news programs we want to, for free. Also available with a $10 Roku device on our older flat screen. It’s hard to find a whole episode, but there are no commercials and it’s much more preferable to paying $180/month for satellite. There are only a few shows on Fox news and Fox business news that we care to watch, anyway.


118 posted on 07/26/2020 8:24:20 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Grandpa Drudge

LOL.

This can’t go on forever. If I declare you the winner can we move on?

My current interest: Finding documentation on the flow of money from at least BLM and Antifa (and probably others) to people on the street. I simply refuse to believe that the weapons, explosives, military gear, food, portable toilets ... are just a gift of the Tooth Fairy.

This seems like an important subject but Google doesn’t agree. And maybe Google is correct. If so I have to wonder what ever happened to investigative journalism.


119 posted on 07/26/2020 8:28:02 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Thanks, I'll consider it a tie. We both win.

And I agree with you that massive funding for all this is coming from powerful political interests, rather than "the people". And I would start looking for who is funding BLM and Antifa.

Here is a search that I used that does not use Google:

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffsb&q=who+funds+antifa+and+blm+organizations&ia=web

120 posted on 07/26/2020 11:56:12 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson