So two things to think about. If individual businesses are requiring masses they are making decision in the free market thst they think are in their shareholders interest. Whether virtue signaling or genuine, they must believe this is necessary to build or maintain business. The free market has spoken
Two: Civil disobedience. You can certainly go into a store without a mask. They will react one of two ways. They will stop you and turn you around tl you comply OR they will tolerate it. It is your right to do the same. If the store tolerates it and Karen (or any of our Karens or Chads on this forum) pick the fight all you have to do is maintain your silent protest as engaging will create the tension they are looking for to force your compliance.
...or they will just shoot me or stick a knife in my ribs. That is already happening.
There is more than one way to skin the cat. If you can’t tolerate reduced air flow with a face mask, a single layer of diaphanous chiffon or silk will meet the generic mandate intent without compromising air flow.
‘If individual businesses are requiring masses they are making decision in the free market thst they think are in their shareholders interest.’
ha; they’re covering their asses so that someone can’t sue them for allowing unmasked shoppers...that is the only reason...
‘The free market has spoken’
horse hockey; the lawyers have spoken...