Posted on 07/15/2020 8:38:39 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
The California Faculty Association is demanding free college tuition for Black and Indigenous students and asking armed police to be removed across the state’s campuses.
The association, a union for faculty in the California State University system, released an eight-page paper with these demands and more, titled “California Faculty Association statement of anti-racism and social justice demands in the wake of anti-black racism, violence, and murder.”
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
how about free for everyone?
why not? follow the lead of some of the politicians who
ve said college should be free for everyone. i believe even pelosi has come out in the past for free tuition for everyone.
Screw the black students, and the non-indigenous Indians whose ancestors came across the land bridge from Asia.
P2 calls for voluntary Prof pay on the part of the Students.
Hay, Hey,
Ho’, Ho’,
Tuition has got to go.
Hideously stupid. See what that does to their already worthless degrees.
also lets throw in loan forgiveness for everyone too! pelosi wanted this as well.
the schools can just write it off. its only wvil wicked capitalism. be bigger than that universities and colleges. just write it all off. reject capitalism and drop all student debt and drop all tuition mandates.
California Libs are bound and determined to turn the Former Golden State into Venezuela. And, nothing will deter them from doing so. Oregon and Washington states are in competition with California to see who can get there first.
If this succeeds, white parents should get their children out of that school.
This union should also be calling for the elimination of tenure for white professors then. After all, you are giving a life term position to a white person, depriving a black person an opportunity for that position. Of course that wold never happen.
What happens if someone like Barry O. is a student? Does he or she get 1/2 price off?
They only get free tuition AFTER they pass their remedial reading and writing classes. /sarc.
FWIW, when I went to university in California in the 60s, tuition at the state college and university system was free. My first year at UCSB there was a $90/semester “activity fee”, but no tuition. The state colleges charged less. The city colleges were pretty much free except for books.
Ronald Reagan didn’t think it fair that working people should have to subsidize the education through their taxes of the children of middle and upper class people who could afford to go to university/college. So he started the move to charge tuition, i.e. to make students (or their parents) actually pay for what they were getting.
I got a great education at little expense for myself and my family. Today, students of all races and colors likely get much less in exchange for paying a great deal more.
Of course not charging “people of color” or colored people less or nothing has to be illegal—thanks to, if nothing else, the 14th Amendment.
I can’t wait for this to happen. When rapes and assaults increase on campus, lawsuits will abound and colleges will close down
Like the children of black NBA stars or the kids of black movie and music stars? They should get free tuition?
So a well off black person’s kid will get free tuition but a poor white kid won’t. If there goal is racial equality and harmony,they’re going in the wrong direction. But as we all know what their real agenda is. Ethnic cleansing and slavery. Think I’m crazy?
Good Call:
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article
Not only that, it would undoubtedly be without any SAT requirement, because, racism.
What a recipe for a successful, safe campus!
That’s discrimination and racist.
Bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.