Posted on 07/06/2020 8:19:09 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
The group Americans for Responsible Technology declares 5G to be unsafe. This fringe anti-technology movement is gaining momentum, thanks to activists, their accomplices in the media, and Russian propaganda outlets like RT.
(Excerpt) Read more at acsh.org ...
Damnable nutters if not traitors/useful idiots all.
As we get farther along we now see you can stand on a street corner and just say the word "Lyft" and a robot car will show up. They will already know where you are by GPS and facial recognition will know who to pick up. All you have to say is "Lakeside Mall, hair salon" and it will take you to the door. You won't have to wave your phone or anything because they already know who you are and how much you owe. They can build a pattern of travel for your whole day second by second. You won't be able to run or hide, or conceal what you are doing. They will know who you associate with and what they talked to you about. In the movies they call it "Big Brother".
When we fall into this trap of our own making, the Marxist, socialists, will have complete control over everyone. Once out, there is no putting the toothpaste back in the tube. We might think we can regulate what the government can listen to, but we already know that's a lie even today.
They will sell it to you as "modern convenience", but it will never be controlled. The reason We are mad a China right now is we already know they will have a "phone home" feature in every 5G chip from China. Do you believe the USA won't do the same?
I see bad juju coming from 5G just because of human nature. The ability to have hundreds of millions of "appliances" connected to the network will allow almost any thought of the most evil people to come alive.
Oh, and what about hackers?
Your openness to those that do not wish to have their freedoms or liberties infringed with chemicals, face masks, etc., is duly noted. Who needs liberals when we have “conservatives” that want to mandate and dictate.
They deserve exactly the same treatment as a drunk driver or a vandal: good, solid Rodney King class beating and public humiliation for the first offense. Anti-vaxxers should be denied ALL medical treatment.
China has stated numerous times their digital currency ( cashless society) could not be instated until 5G was complete across their land. Digital currency runs on the 5G platform. China has recently announce 5G is wired, and has announced the roll out of their national digital currency shortly.
Wow, and I thought this was “Free” Republic...looks like I stumbled across Democrat Underground.
Ha, ha, very good!
Sounds like my mother-in-law. She won’t have a microwave oven, a computer, or a cell phone, because she thinks they put out “rays”. At her age, I don’t think she needs to worry about the possible long term affects of “rays”.
Coming from a useful idiot dupe of the Chicoms I’ll take that as a compliment.
“The risk assessment for all cell phone use was done by electrical engineers, not medical types.”
Very misleading. Risk assessments for electronic devices transmitting energy are done in house first. But they do them to standards.
The standards are devised by various high powered working teams (”ad hoc”) with top-of-their-field expertise in the subject matter. These teams consist of Doctors (many kinds), engineers, Phds (physicists, EEs, Antenna, etc.), EEE reps,sometimes lawyers (ugh), and then drafts released for review by the entire community with interest and expertise.
After several rounds of reviews, meetings, updates, they bring in government bodies to informally get them in the loop. More feedback, meetings, revisions. Then they release “The Final Recommendations of XXXX by the YYYY Team...” and hope the appropriate governing agency (NIST, ANSI, OSHA, EU, FDA, etc) will give their blessing, or at least do nothing.
These standards then get voted on and released by the appropriate governing body. (Until then, “The Final Recommendations...” get used)
THEN the engineers at a company develop and test their devices to those standards.
How do I know this? Military RF tech (1200 hrs initial classroom training), then AS and EE degree, then development of medical devices for over 25 years. Including working with the ad hoc comitte that set the maximum radiation doses allowed from MRI machines, while working with some of the inventors of MRI at Hopkins. The radiation standards and physics are similar to cell phones, only a lot higher doses! But shorter times. I’ve worked on several other radiation emitting medical devices as well.
Hint: All use SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) as the standard method for predicting and testing safety in the human body.
Everything emitting EM radiation below ionizing (which is all the way up the band, beyond microwave, beyond gigahertz, near the top of Terahertz, beyond infrared, to UV light, btw—cancer, ring a bell?) is lab tested against SAR limits. The results of which determine whether your device gets regulatory approval. All radiation emitting devices must pass the approval body, then they permanently put the appropriate stamp on the device. (UL, CE...)
Although I was an informal guinea pig sometimes in the MRI machine to see if certain settings would hurt. Sometimes they did.
Anyone interested just look up SAR and cellphones to learn. Start there.
“The risk assessment for all cell phone use was done by electrical engineers, not medical types.”
Very misleading. Risk assessments for electronic devices transmitting energy are done in house first. But they do them to standards.
The standards are devised by various high powered working teams (”ad hoc”) with top-of-their-field expertise in the subject matter. These teams consist of Doctors (many kinds), engineers, Phds (physicists, EEs, Antenna, etc.), EEE reps,sometimes lawyers (ugh), and then drafts released for review by the entire community with interest and expertise.
After several rounds of reviews, meetings, updates, they bring in government bodies to informally get them in the loop. More feedback, meetings, revisions. Then they release “The Final Recommendations of XXXX by the YYYY Team...” and hope the appropriate governing agency (NIST, ANSI, OSHA, EU, FDA, etc) will give their blessing, or at least do nothing.
These standards then get voted on and released by the appropriate governing body. (Until then, “The Final Recommendations...” get used)
THEN the engineers at a company develop and test their devices to those standards.
How do I know this? Military RF tech (1200 hrs initial classroom training), then AS and EE degree, then development of medical devices for over 25 years. Including working with the ad hoc comitte that set the maximum radiation doses allowed from MRI machines, while working with some of the inventors of MRI at Hopkins. The radiation standards and physics are similar to cell phones, only a lot higher doses! But shorter times. I’ve worked on several other radiation emitting medical devices as well.
Hint: All use SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) as the standard method for predicting and testing safety in the human body.
Everything emitting EM radiation below ionizing (which is all the way up the band, beyond microwave, beyond gigahertz, near the top of Terahertz, beyond infrared, to UV light, btw—cancer, ring a bell?) is lab tested against SAR limits. The results of which determine whether your device gets regulatory approval. All radiation emitting devices must pass the approval body, then they permanently put the appropriate stamp on the device. (UL, CE...)
Although I was an informal guinea pig sometimes in the MRI machine to see if certain settings would hurt. Sometimes they did.
Anyone interested just look up SAR and cellphones to learn. Start there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.