Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As the crisis deepens, Q says rise or die
American Thinker ^ | Deborah Franklin

Posted on 07/06/2020 5:22:48 AM PDT by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-216 next last
To: Okeydoker
Good afternoon, puker.


101 posted on 07/06/2020 10:51:31 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Stravinsky
"And, in fact, people have been doing that research for a long time. ... But now all of that important work is tied to some nutty, loony cult."

Almost like that was the plan right from the start.


102 posted on 07/06/2020 10:52:54 AM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I don’t doubt that there is a person in the Trump circle of friends that is posting as Q. The real issue is that most of us don’t have the time to read through and figure out what in the world he/she means. Simply put, most of us don’t have time for that.

Jesus told us that when we speak, let our yes be yes and our no be no. It seems to me that he wants us to speak plain and simple.

If we’re all honest, it really looks pretty silly to most most people. It’s kid of dumb to have to go back later and read something and then see what the code talk meant. By that time it’s happened and we have to scratch our heads and wonder why he/she couldn’t just use sentences that say it like it is.


103 posted on 07/06/2020 10:56:28 AM PDT by Preachin' (I stand with many voters who will never vote for a pro abortion candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Okeydoker
Ya big goof. What makes you think Powell is read in on the Q operation. Let's see Flynn deny it.

Critical thinking is beyond you bots.


104 posted on 07/06/2020 10:57:48 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jenkinsducky

No argument there ...

... I’m confused. I don’t see coerced, forced, or violent in my post but apparently it was worth breaking your 15 year silence to remind us. OK.

Well I suppose Q has asked people to trust, to learn, to pray, and recently as Gen Flynn did to take or reiterate a pledge which shouldn’t give any American pause, but hardly “force.” I agree 100% that anyone reading coercion into Q brought it there themselves.


105 posted on 07/06/2020 11:00:26 AM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
And it is so secretive and esoteric with secret codes and symbols that nobody knows what the hell they’re talking about. They speak in tongues.

It takes intelligence to understand the comms. People like you, who lack it, can listen to us smart people for interpretations. There's hope for the retarded.

#DontGiveUp


106 posted on 07/06/2020 11:02:42 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
If we have to depend on Q to save us, we’re doomed.

Don't be a drama queen. Nobody depends on 'Q to save us'. We do depend on Q to spearhead Trump's movement to awaken a sleeping and indoctrinated populace.

And people like you who stand in the way of that are domestic enemies, whether your being purposeful or ignorant.

#MoveBGetOutTheWay


107 posted on 07/06/2020 11:06:04 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
He’s still a fraud.

You're still a fraud.


108 posted on 07/06/2020 11:07:07 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

The very best you will get on the subject is interpretation. Theories based on the drops are made and nothing is concrete, but over time the information is (on average) accurate , insightful, with plenty of proofs. The timing is the biggest challenge as many drops and “predictions” (again, just interpretations by readers) have not happened when “expected”. However, drops and discussions made two or three years ago are beginning to become proven out today, so the roadmap was essentially laid out early without a timeline.

Trust drops are generally aimed at something someone has done, is doing, or will do. The issue is the timing and sometimes something occurs after a drop that disrupts that earlier interpretation, or is intended for a completely different timeframe. Regarding Sessions specifically, he may have started investigations that will lead to a desired outcome or he completed a specific task that was needed at the time, or even have a second role to play in the future (as a witness perhaps). We just don’t know. That Sessions violated that trust is also a possibility.

It’s really a shame that many have shut themselves off on the topic and discounted it completely as things happening now were pretty much laid out and discussed a year or two ago in the dedicated threads here on FR. Example, Maxwell’s arrest timing was news to even Q readers, but piecing together her role with Epstein and all the other players happened easily two years ago.

The real issue is keeping up with it. It’s not easy to digest 3+ years of discussion on it if you start now (~150 weeks/~3 threads per week/~1500-2000 post per thread), but each thread starts with good resource links to help as much as possible.


109 posted on 07/06/2020 11:08:13 AM PDT by xander (Textual correctness unlikely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater
Well, you know what, we're not little babies...

You are, binkems.

It's almost like Q is a controlled opposition project designed to run out the clock on the Trump presidency...

Stupidest conspiracy theory EVER.

#TaterTot


110 posted on 07/06/2020 11:09:57 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
IMO Q was likely started by covert anti-Trumpers from within the early WH.

Whoa, talk about conspiracy nuts.

You put a lot of thought into that one. Almost as of you're playing for the other team.

Here's a simple thought for you to cut the heart out of your entire conspiracy theory.

p.s. If the Q program was harmful to Trump, he would destroy it with a simple tweet. He hasn't, so it isn't. Quite the opposite.

p.p.s. Keep it simple stupid (KISS)


111 posted on 07/06/2020 11:14:21 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'

Q doesn’t talk in code. He asks questions, and often provides very interesting info, before it’s in the news. If anyone wants to learn about Q messages, the dedicated Q threads have all kinds of links and summary info at the top of each new thread. It’s not one person in the circle of Trump friends. Q was designed as an information backchannel to get info out around the mainstream media fake news. To help people ferret out stuff on their own, with links, questions and information posted by Q.

Q is a team - less than 10, all but three are military.

Q has to post that way to avoid disclosing any classified info. Asks questions. Wants people to think for themselves. One can also go to the very beginning of Q message and read them in order.

THere are several aggragates that post Q messages, here is one. Sometimes Q posts disinfo on purpose to confuse the bad guys who all read it, more so in the beginning than currently. Sometimes Q is communicating with operators in the field, but not very often.

The titles in the link below are not from the Q team but the aggragor puts them up:
https://qmap.pub/


112 posted on 07/06/2020 11:34:06 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: bagster

As if I need conspiracy lessons from Baggy!


113 posted on 07/06/2020 11:37:09 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: bagster
How ya been little buddy? Good to see you outside the Q playground. What do you say we [you] try to keep it under control this time so this thread doesn't get pulled? I enjoy being able to discuss the Q operation out in the real world where I'm actually able to say something less than flattering about Q without breaking the bossman's Q directive.


114 posted on 07/06/2020 11:38:02 AM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
As if I need conspiracy lessons from Baggy!

You need lessons from somebody. That last one you put up was a doozy.


115 posted on 07/06/2020 11:39:46 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Actually, you could.

If you want to rise to the eye watering levels of conspiracy tomfoolery, there is no one better. ;)

116 posted on 07/06/2020 11:41:50 AM PDT by deadrock (<img src="WIDTH420WIDTH420.jpeg" width="420">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater
I'm actually able to say something less than flattering about Q without breaking the bossman's Q directive.

You know what, tater tot? Every time you say something 'less than flattering' about Q, you are attacking President Trump and standing in the way of MAGA.

You know that, right?

Because the facts are this. The Qanon program is fully sanctioned and authorized by President Trump.

To deny that is to deny logic, reason, and evidence.

So I ask you. What is your motivation for attacking the President's patriotic movement?

100 words or less and I want it on my desk by Friday.

p.s. This thread violates bossman's Q directive all by its lonesome. But I do like to take advantage while I can to pound sense into you normies.


117 posted on 07/06/2020 11:45:34 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

Ha!


118 posted on 07/06/2020 11:48:15 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: bagster
"Every time you say something 'less than flattering' about Q, you are attacking President Trump and standing in the way of MAGA."

No, I'm not. I'm attacking your FAITH in Q which does not allow you to civilly discuss the possibility that Q is a controlled opposition figurehead designed to keep out of the mainstream conversation the knowledge of how our world is run from behind the scenery by oligarchs. Take what's known and can no longer be hidden and attach some Qookery to it and voilà the fact that our world is run by oligarchs is now considered a conspiracy theory by the less informed of our countrymen. Keep the faith little buddy - you and your faith are a big part of the plan. But, unlike you, I question exactly whose plan it is.


"p.s. This thread violates bossman's Q directive all by its lonesome."

Yes, but I didn't post the thread and like you I'm just taking advantage of its appearance. Maybe if we mind our manners the mods will see that we can actually discuss this subject without tearing this site apart. I think that would be a good thing for Free Republic. Besides that, I miss your commentary when the mods give you a timeout.


"But I do like to take advantage while I can to pound sense into you normies."

You, little buddy, are about the only one here, or anywhere else, that considers me to be normal. As proof I present the fact that I enjoy talking with YOU.


119 posted on 07/06/2020 12:14:52 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: bagster

If you don’t like what General Flynn’s lawyer said about the JFK line, you should take it up with her.

I’m sure your cred is so much more impressive than hers.

LMAO, “Go Trust Sessions” yourself.


120 posted on 07/06/2020 12:22:12 PM PDT by romanesq (Flubro, from the people who brought you the stupidity of grifters & the letter Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson