First order of business is to indict and convict these politicians who murdered. They are smart enough to pass laws to protect them while they committed these murders
Mail-in voting is the goal, and the only consideration... If enough people are sickened and dying, the case will be made that without mail-in voting, people will be disenfranchised.
It doesn’t matter how many people must die to get to that point. Those dead peoples votes will still be counted.
Yes, but will they all die in time to vote in November?
bkmk
Americans who live or work in Mexico, mostly near Mexicali, are crossing the border to get back to the USA. The Hospitals north of the border in Calexico and El Centro are airlifting these American patients to hospitals in San Diego and Riverside Counties, as they are overwhelmed. Newsom has nothing to do with this.
Newsom and CA are bad enough that we don’t need to make stuff up that is easily proven false. It just makes conservatives look like misinformed, low information kooks. The Nursing Home part is legit. CA is PAYING extra cash on top of insurance money to BRIBE elder care facilities to take in COVID patients. This even includes “Assisted Living” homes that have no RN’s, doctors, or other skilled medical personnel.
Considering I received a census form, filled it out on-line then received another census form in the mail along with a phone call telling me to go on-line to fill out the census....it’s not too hard to expect mail-in vote fraud....
P
how exactly does he intend to ‘step up enforcement’ with defunded police departments distracted with rioters?
What does he care?
According to polls (believe them or not) -he has an over 90+% approval rating in the state. He’ll never be recalled. He’ll never be voted out.
Because: Demographics.
He’s driving out all productive tax-paying citizens and businesses that employ people and importing the 3rd world from Mexico as quickly as he can so they can vote Democrat in the presidential election.
Not that it matters, California is sadly solid blue.
To constitute depraved indifference, the defendant’s conduct must be ‘so wanton, so deficient in a moral sense of concern, so lacking in regard for the life or lives of others, and so blameworthy as to warrant the same criminal liability as that which the law imposes upon a person who intentionally causes a crime. Depraved indifference focuses on the risk created by the defendant’s conduct, not the injuries actually resulting.
In one case, People v Register, 60 NY2d 273, 469 NYS2d 599 (1983),while exploring the meaning of “depraved indifference recklessness” the Court of Appeals ruled that intoxication is not a defense or excuse to “depraved mind murder,” although it may be to intentional murder. Its analysis started with distinguishing reckless manslaughter from the “depraved indifference recklessness” necessary for murder:
“to bring defendant’s conduct within the murder statute, the People were required to establish also that defendant’s act was imminently dangerous and presented a very high risk of death to others and that it was committed under circumstances which evidenced a wanton indifference to human life or a depravity of mind. . . . . The crime differs from intentional murder in that it results not from a specific, conscious intent to cause death, but from an indifference to or disregard of the risks attending defendant’s conduct.” 60 NY2d at 274.