To: ShadowAce
I find this deceptive and very concerning. For a number of important reasons, hosting GNU development on a proprietary Microsoft platform should be verboten. I wish the author would have stated the reasons more fully, rather than some vague insinuations.
To: kosciusko51
Yeah—that’s the weak point of his article. I thought about not posting it because of that, actually.
15 posted on
06/30/2020 5:57:10 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: kosciusko51; ShadowAce
"I wish the author would have stated the reasons more fully, rather than some vague insinuations."
If all the GNU (Free, open) posts first go through Micr$oft) then the harvesting and patenting by M$oft gives them expert first in line overviews of good ideas for them to monetize and restrict to their products would be my guess.
With a tweak here and there, voila a new patent that M$oft has the resources to beat down any independent programmer and his original programming.
That's my take.
17 posted on
06/30/2020 6:08:26 AM PDT by
Tunehead54
(Nothing funny here ;-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson