Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker

But nobody, except Jim makes a living from FR. Thus, there is not tangible harm from being zotted without warning. Indeed, FR republic supports a variety of viewpoints. YouTube was Stephan M’s income source. There is a huge difference in a forum where you don‘t receive income and a platform for your business. Especially since the creators own the content they place on YouTube. By not allowing him access they are stealing. Posting here is not even lose to comparable.


42 posted on 06/29/2020 5:24:44 PM PDT by Fai Mao (There is no justice until The PIAPS is legally executed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Fai Mao
YouTube was Stephan M’s income source. >

Did he have a contract? Did YouTube violate the contract? If that's the issue, then this is a simple question of contract law. Stephan M can sue them and if they breached his contract he'll win. If there isn't a breach but he's just whining that they should *have* to do business with him for a some reason, then he's just a pathetic loser. Nobody has to do business with anybody.

51 posted on 06/29/2020 5:34:04 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao
YouTube was Stephan M’s income source.

And he ought to be damned grateful YouTube let him use their platform for free for as long as they did.

How many billions do you think they've invested in their technology?

Do you think Stefan has a right to use it for his benefit?

52 posted on 06/29/2020 5:35:19 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson