So I guess Under Armour was not motivated by the academic quality of UCLA.
1 posted on
06/28/2020 3:31:47 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: C19fan
With sales and profits way down, time to cut expenses. Sorry universities but your programs are high cost and limited value when you cannot provide any exposure for the company’s products. This maybe the 1st of many cancellations, Nike next?
2 posted on
06/28/2020 4:18:57 AM PDT by
Lockbox
To: C19fan
Even with all the posturing and virtue signalling, all it is ever about with these companies is money. I hope the Mob turns on them.
3 posted on
06/28/2020 4:42:17 AM PDT by
beef
(Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
To: C19fan
$280 million for just one school? No wonder it has to sell a $1 Chinese t-shirt fot $50.
4 posted on
06/28/2020 6:16:40 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(In 2016 Obama ended America's 220 year tradition of peaceful transfer of power after an election.)
To: C19fan
Isn’t it kind of hard for anyone to ‘market’ Under Armor - when they wear said products UNDER other clothes? ;)
5 posted on
06/28/2020 7:33:01 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: C19fan
Good, it all needs to die.
6 posted on
06/28/2020 7:39:26 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: C19fan
“provide unspecified marketing benefits”
if it’s not specified, how is it to be accomplished?
7 posted on
06/28/2020 9:18:07 AM PDT by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson