Posted on 06/27/2020 8:59:12 AM PDT by ransomnote
I believe Q has stated that there are more good than bad, but I don’t remember any 99% good except from Hannity.
crazy about knopfler!
==========+=======
A guitar master, for sure.
Democrat Red Republican Blue
Prior to 1992, most election maps referenced Republican in blue and Democrat in red. However, after 1992, the media determined that using red for Democrats might be editorially construed to suggest that Democrat politicians and policies were in line with those of Socialist Democrats, which, of course, they are.
“The National Guard is not the militia.”
According to the Dick Act the National Guard is the organized militia and every fit adult male is the unorganized militia.
The Constitution mandates that Congress arm the militia, I want my Trump gun, the left got their O’Bummer phones.
Re: Q 4535
“they wrote so many words. . .”
Yep. Bringing newbies to Q up to date.
“#3 is our bodies in the form of organ harvesting and human sex trafficking.”
I agree with your #3=bodies. In addition to the two items you mentioned, I believe it also includes use as foot soldiers and cannon fodder.
Wikipedia:
Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press*, or assembly. The test was replaced in 1969 with Brandenburg v. Ohio's "imminent lawless action" test.
*Emphasis, mine.
Wikipedia:
"Imminent lawless action" is a standard currently used that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), for defining the limits of freedom of speech. Brandenburg clarified what constituted a "clear and present danger", the standard established by Schenck v. United States (1919), and overruled Whitney v. California (1927), which had held that speech that merely advocated violence could be made illegal. Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely. While the precise meaning of "imminent" may be ambiguous in some cases, the court provided later clarification in Hess v. Indiana (1973) in which the court found that Hess's words did not fall outside the limits of protected speech, in part, because his speech "amounted to nothing more than advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time,"[1] and therefore did not meet the imminence requirement.
The two legal prongs that constitute incitement of imminent lawless action are as follows:
Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action.[2]
Right along with CDB’s great song, I must submit this for my household:
According to really old laws/concepts, posse duty is like jury duty-required when called upon. However, in practice, some sheriffs have asked for volunteers and have ongoing training to assist the sheriff should they be needed. We actually have citizen volunteers here who have assisted after tornadoes and emergencies.
I could find nothing that limits who can be deputized to be in the posse. From a practical stand point, active duty, and probably NG would be excluded, but Veterans could be part of such a group.
I also ran across an army group CBRNE CCMAF authorized in NDAA in 2007 and deployed in 2008 for duty on the homeland-including civil unrest. Congress supposedly reversed this in 2008, but Bush said it wasn't appropriate or something and did it anyway. I found no further data on this group after 2008.
Not sure about NG, but there could be a conflict if Gov and Sheriff were not on the same page so maybe there's something in the military regs that would prevent it-still researching.
These riots to me are a double edged sword. I understand that POTUS is respecting state's rights, showcasing weak response from DemocRAT run areas, and avoiding the trap of creating an opportunity for another “kent state” propaganda lollapoloosa.
However, the optics of tweeting vs action is unsettling-appears to be weak. Being a Law and Order candidate is great if you are running against an incumbent.
Being the incumbent and complaining about riots, when you have the power to do something creates a certain amount of Cognitive dissonance.
I hope people who voted for POTUS are not going to be disappointed and just stay home —he has delivered so much. I am sure that special Federal Teams are actually active-and hope POTUS gets to announce outstanding results sooner rather than later.
I forgot about the Dick Act. I should be able to deduct the cost of a suitable rifle and sidearm, plus annual practice ammo from my taxes. Along with other needful gear.
Then well see what loathsome attack on America the globalist-commies trot out next, and Chinavirus will fade out of peoples consciousness like the memory of a bad dream.
***************************************************************************************
Can hardly wait for CV to be forgotten and the darned masks to be thrown on the ash heap of history.
As long as President Trump remains in the White House that is not going to happen. And why should it? Never give a damn bunch of idiots an even break. With the idiots help they will carry this shit on past the November Elections.
NEW Q POSTS DROPPED AT 3:56 PM ET
JUNE 28, 2020
START AT #488
As long as President Trump remains in the White House that is not going to happen. And why should it? Never give a damn bunch of idiots an even break. With the idiots help they will carry this shit on past the November Elections.
*****************************************************************************************************
Then they are going to be making even more people mad at DemcRATS—CV is losing it’s PSYOPS value, so they are going to have to add some new twist.
Apologies if already posted - fits in with Luciferianism at the UN -
Top child advocate at United Nations-funded charity pleads guilty to sexually assaulting boy
Peter Newell, 77, has been sentenced to prison Victim was 12 years old at the time Newell was a top official at the Association for the Protection of All Children charity, which was funded in part by the United Nations
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.