How can you tell a battery scientist is lying?
His lips are moving.
I hope this battery pans out.
But at least once a month somewhere around the world some university/research institute/battery startup issues a press release about a massive breakthrough in battery tech.
How can you tell a battery scientist is lying?
His lips are moving.
I hope this battery pans out.
But at least once a month somewhere around the world some university/research institute/battery startup issues a press release about a massive breakthrough in battery tech.
I’ll be buying up Air Futures.......
While I really hope this is true, I will file the current claim right next to my climate change, Wu-Flu, and Russian influence files.
Nothing about storage capacity compared to LiIon...and charge loss data does not look good. Their presentation technically is not good.
My great-grandfather was born in 1865. In 1891, he went to work for a battery company in Cologne, Germany. Started off as a technician in customer service, worked his way up to sales and contracts, opened the company’s first remote office in Danzig, Germany, and made a lot of money. He was able to build a fine home in the best part of town. Batteries in the 1890s and 1900s were the high-tech industry of the day.
That photo, wow. Don’t think it will be powering my phone any time soon.
That thing doesn’t look small in the picture. Gonna have to buy a trailer when they start putting these on cell phones. :-)
“The round-trip efficiency of the system — ie, the percentage of inputted energy that is outputted at the end — is about 65%, a far cry from lithium-ion’s 95%, but this is accounted for in the LCOS figures.”
So does this mean that 35% of the energy is lost right out of the gate?