When they say “Funded”, are they talking about Ad revenue? Because Google controls 70% of the ad revenue on the internet, but that does not mean they are funding the sites. They are doing business with them.
BIg difference.
Whatever it means, the list they provide gives Trump nothing but backstabbing turncoats.
The article does not say. I’m not surprised. Disinformation...
It actually says believed to be beneficiaries of Google donations.
Believed to be.
“The list (at the bottom of this article) includes key conservative influencers from major think tanks and publications – some of whom are believed to be beneficiaries of large Google donations.”
“Note: This document is updated biannually and includes a list of politically-engaged trade associations, independent third-party organizations and other tax-exempt groups that receive the most substantial contributions from Google’s U.S. Government Affairs and Public Policy team.”
https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/trade_association_and_third_party_groups.pdf
He’s blog pimping for hits...ironically hits drive ad revenue.
I know that Amazon allows users to pick a charity to give a small amount to when a purchase is made. The Heritage Foundation is on the list.