You and I are on the same page with this except I think it’s too early to say if he was killed by Chauvin. It looks like he was, I agree. But then, It looked like those cops that beat King would easily be found guilty in a criminal court of law. They weren’t. And it was because the Jury saw stuff the rest of us didn’t.
I firmly believe the same thing is going on here, but it remains to be seen what will happen. I’m not saying Chauvin is innocent. My crime seems to be refusing to say he’s guilty until a jury says so.
Personally, I think he’s a thug. But then, that is because I think that that is the only way a cop could survive as a cop in that neighborhood. So there is that...
Let me be clear - I want the legal process to take its course, too. And there is no crime in saying that.
That said, as people smarter than me on this topic have said - Chaivin is basically incompetent at best.
I believe it's possible to simultaneously want the legal process to run its course, and already have personally adjudicated the accused. To wit: OJ is a murderer, President Clinton suborned perjury, Hillary's server was illegal, and Epstein didn't kill himself. Oh, and Springsteen sucks.