Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
We either need to seize it or break it. Either way, we need to deprive the enemy of it's use.

Odd thing for a free speech absolutist to say, but once you're completely past principle and on to tribal blood lust I suppose it's to be expected.

32 posted on 06/11/2020 10:21:36 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo
Odd thing for a free speech absolutist to say, but once you're completely past principle and on to tribal blood lust I suppose it's to be expected.

I think that depends on how you view "free speech." When you have a system that denies the right to speech for one half the population, and amplifies the right to speech for the other, then you don't really have "free speech", do you?

We are extra constitutional right now. If the rules don't apply to them, then we should not respect them either.

You will likely be asserting your support for the existing system till they march you into the camp.

I believe in the right to keep and bear arms, but I do not extend this idea to enemy soldiers during a war.

I think one of the major differences between you and I is that I realize we are in a war, and you don't seem to grasp the significance of what is going on right now.

We are being "otherized", and you will be caught up in it too.

57 posted on 06/11/2020 10:36:53 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson