I think that depends on how you view "free speech." When you have a system that denies the right to speech for one half the population, and amplifies the right to speech for the other, then you don't really have "free speech", do you?
We are extra constitutional right now. If the rules don't apply to them, then we should not respect them either.
You will likely be asserting your support for the existing system till they march you into the camp.
I believe in the right to keep and bear arms, but I do not extend this idea to enemy soldiers during a war.
I think one of the major differences between you and I is that I realize we are in a war, and you don't seem to grasp the significance of what is going on right now.
We are being "otherized", and you will be caught up in it too.
You were posting about the media.
Do you have an example of a publication or broadcast that's been banned?
You will likely be asserting your support for the existing system till they march you into the camp.
Well, at least until I'm given a viable alternative.
I certainly don't share your vision of a system based on arbitrary standards that you (or the Commissar of Compelled Speech) think appropriate.
I think one of the major differences between you and I is that I realize we are in a war...
Sorry, not ready for martial law yet.