Unless he believes there is a greater danger to come in the future by not letting the White House be besieged.
Yes, I can’t disagree with this point.
I was thinking about posting this out back, but after reading some of the latest insanity thought better of it. But here, you all understand the concept of a “hypothetical”...
GIven the goal of MAGA and draining the swamp and restoring some semblence of traditional America, suppose “all options” were truly on the table. None are perfect, all have consequences -short and long term- and pain is inevitable regardless of which is chosen. But also assume that human actors inside the castle would be protected and safe either way. “Game Theory”.
Which would you choose - incur a highly painful and visible but limited loss in the near term in order to get to the goal more quickly? Or pull in all resources to defend against that loss and incur the consequences and prolong the process?
Of course I’m making a lot of assumptions but I think it’s worth thinking about.