Posted on 06/01/2020 9:13:30 AM PDT by ransomnote
This scenario kind of reminds me of the hit on Seth then the assassins were assassinated.
Get rid of witness then get rid of assassins.
Spitballing.
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper holds a press briefing of June 3, 2020
Very true.
Amen.
I would put nothing past them. They're all about deception and destruction.
Given the new narrative about "right wing" participation in the rioting, it's obvious that they're trying to deflect blame.
It wasn’t my claim, D. It was my response, “What?!?”
Re I can’t believe it’s riot season already. I still have my Covid decorations up.
.....
Now, that’s funny right there! You’re a hoot!
Another expression is "Sounds like an Irish tenor passing a kidney stone".
Re: proposition that people move to the country
All for that. Picked this piece off of Liberty Daily about ANTIFA threat to Sparta, Illinois. Promising to burn farm houses and destroy livestock. This weekend.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-03-antifa-terrorists-sparta-illinois-burn-farmhouses-kill-livestock.html
Not that I give Ellison any credit for having Brain #1, but his elevation of charges from murder 3 to murder 2 seems pretty dumb. Especially since he has no idea what the totality of evidence is going to be yet. I looked at the Minnesota statute, and the relevant part of the charge is this:
“causes the death of a human being with intent to effect the death of that person or another, but without premeditation”
So now, he has to prove “intent”, in contrast to 3rd degree murder which is causing death without intent. I guess we’ll see how good a lawyer he is (i.e. can hire) or how easily the jury can be bought if the evidence turns out to be not as clear-cut as many think.
I speed-watched this video by a doctor who make no bones about the fact that he thinks the cops killed George Floyd. But his explanation of the anatomy and how cause of death is determined is objective and informative:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oqEp63duIc
But the real reason I post the link is relevant to these elevated charges. Even Dr. Baden said “police are under the impression that if you can talk, you are able to breathe”. Which the doctor argues with, but the point is, if the cops claim that’s what they thought, and that’s what they were trained to treat as factually correct, then how can you prove “intent” when they continued to restrain a man who was able to talk? (At least for some of the time).
Re Project Veritas Expose:
Heavens! IT’S HABBENING!
Surprisingly good interview of POTUS by Sean Spicer. I wouldn’t give Spicer particularly high marks as Press Secretary, but maybe he’s found his calling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDnIJb_J9mI&t=666s
Totally agreed. Thought it was media invent. However, as I said she deflected answering to the validity of Esper, or private conversations regarding POTUS.
However, she said if the POTUS should lose confidence in Esper, the media would be notified.
Later, she repeated something about Wray and the Director of Defense and POTUS losing confidence in them the press will be informed.
It’s the same image, just with the iPad’s Photo Magic Wand pushed to 100%,
and the Saturation and Brilliance both pushed up from 50 to 88%.
Hence the one hundred and eighty eight percent Bagsterfied Pagoda!
(It weren’t no lie, it be a factual 188%!)
I provided no faketual herbal cover.
;-)
~Easy
Re Gun Slides:
Gun/ military slides are manly and exciting. I also love them, blu. And they really are Q related, if you know what I mean.
You mean Post #4399?
I will have to do a tour later. this n that n other stuff piled up on me. Here’s Truth Hammer:
https://twitter.com/TruthHammer888
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.