Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Part A

Please Quote Post To Which You Are Replying

Please help our thread skip right along by including (quoting) an excerpt of the post to which you are replying. Please click here for details. ThankQ.

 


Part B

Please Use Graphic Content Warnings

When posting disturbing content, please type GRAPHIC CONTENT in the first line of your post. If possible, provide the general context in a few words.Please click here for more information. ThankQ

 


Part C

All 8ch links and link variations are prohibited

The board owner specifically prohibits the posting of 8ch links, and all variations of 8ch links (e.g., broken links, images, etc.). Please click here for details. ThankQ

9 posted on 05/23/2020 9:18:58 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Hip Hip Horray! I made it into the new thread on this sacred Holiday! Blessings to all who gave their full measure of devotion and GOD BLESS AMERICA AND DONALD J TRUMP!
lex


73 posted on 05/23/2020 11:01:55 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: tang-soo; RitaOK; defconw; grey_whiskers; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; ...

#4310 HUSSEIN’s SHADOW PRESIDENCY

I’ve been examining the other documents shown in the picture of Susan Rice’s declassed email.

The first thing I noticed, is that the document which is under the top right corner of the Rice email, and which the yellow highlighter seems to be pointing shows:

“counsel David… Then a censored line, ….then “Parti”

I have nothing to back this up, but my speculation is that the “David” could possibly be David Boies. His wife, Mary, is a very big mover and shaker and is a member of the CFR.

“Parti…” could be “Participate” or “Participation” or other variation of that word.

From my Boies file, various factoids emerged during FReeQish conversations about him:

To: RitaOK
Vindman & Fiona Hill are represented by Boies, Schiller & Flexner. That law firm also did work for Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company that paid Hunter Biden millions of dollars. That firm also employed Hunter Biden & paid him more than he’s worth. Weird, huh?

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3795315/posts?page=187#187
187 posted on 11/20/2019, 8:58:38 PM by defconw

AND

To: defconw; RitaOK; ransomnote
Vindman & Fiona Hill are represented by Boies, Schiller & Flexner. That law firm also did work for Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company that paid Hunter Biden millions of dollars. That firm also employed Hunter Biden & paid him more than he’s worth. Weird, huh?
Flashback: The general counsel of the law firm that employed Hunter Biden and now represents Vindman and Fiona Hill allegedly tried to steal his own mother’s house.
Source:https://twitter.com/ArthurSchwartz/status/1197315309637689344

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3795315/posts?page=199#199
199 posted on 11/20/2019, 9:15:27 PM by grey_whiskers

AND

Tang-soo also pointed out in
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3795315/posts?page=219#219
That David Boies is also the attorney representing Epstain’s accuser Virginia Roberts.

AND

In post 268,
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3795315/posts?page=268#268

defconw shared this twitter link demonstrating that David Boies’ son is friends with George Soros’ son, Alexander:
https://twitter.com/rising_serpent/status/947878669984378882?lang=en

AND

NEONREVOLT did a dig with David Boise in it:
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/04/04/are-you-ready-to-see-wonderland-666-5th-ave-and-cabal-pizzagate-pedogate-qanon-greatawakening-5thaveanon/

This image found in neeonrevolt’s dig denotes a connection with Larry Ellison and ORACLE….
https://www.neonrevolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/firefox_2018-04-04_16-42-55.png

Recall and note that ORACLE is a place where our beloved Ezra Cohen Watkins was ensconced for a period of time.

END PART ONE
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q


664 posted on 05/24/2020 6:04:53 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: tang-soo; defconw; RitaOK; grey_whiskers; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; ...

PART TWO #4310

Moving on to the other document, what I found was a bit strange, but perhaps other anons and FReeQs can find significance in this:

On the top part of the Rice document, in the “To: CC; From” part, is a big censor mark. Just above that censor mark is another document under the Rice document. It also happens to be under the document which I’m speculating has to do with Boies.

On that document, it is possible to see an address:

“555 Eleventh St. NW, St….
Washington DC 20004 - 1304…
Tel: +1.202.637.2200 Fax…

www.lw.com

FIRM/AFFILIATION
Barcelona
Be…”

I pulled up my MAPS program and entered the above address. I was surprised to find that the little red map pin was centered on the Star Bucks.

Also in the vicinity, among others are the Peterson House, Qdoba Mexican Eats, T Mobile, Saks Fifth Ave, M&T Bank, Sephora, LA TIMES Washington Bureau, Ford’s Theater, National Gallery of Art, Federal Elections Commission, Potomac Electric Co, National Union Bldg, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and Hotel Harrington.

I will not discuss all of these, but just a few:

Petersen House is where Lincoln was taken after he was shot at Ford’s Theater.

LA Times Washington Bureau proximity is interesting.

I grabbed the Qdoba because I like the Q in the name! :-D

Federal Elections Commission gave me pause, as did the proximity of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Now, the question is, why would Q be showing us a document which would be of Q interest from a STARBUCK’S???

I am too chicken to call that phone number. I have no idea what it might reach.

However, the web link, www.lw.com leads to Latham and Watkins LLC. It is a law office.

Here is from the “About” page:

Latham is dedicated to working with clients to help them achieve their business goals and overcome legal challenges anywhere in the world. From a global platform spanning 14 countries, Latham lawyers help clients succeed.
Devoted to Client Service

Latham is committed to helping clients achieve their business strategies and providing outstanding legal services around the world. Clients depend on the firm to find innovative solutions to complex business issues, and Latham lawyers leverage the firm’s global platform to help clients handle these challenges.

Latham is a single, integrated partnership focused on providing the most collaborative approach to client service. The firm offers:

Deep experience in successful enterprise-transforming transactions and in defending bet-the-company controversies

A solutions-based approach, providing innovative and sound commercial advice

Optimally sized teams that provide cost-effective and high-quality services

A culture geared toward establishing and nurturing long-term client relationships  

Just the Facts
The People
More than 2,700 lawyers across a global platform spanning 14 countries; Latham lawyers speak more than 60 languages 
      
The Practice
TRULY A “ONE-FIRM” FIRM – LATHAM HAS NO HEADQUARTERS, AND FIRM MANAGEMENT IS SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, ALLOWING LATHAM TO SERVICE CLIENTS WITH THE BEST-SUITED TEAMS REGARDLESS OF LOCATION

More than 60 international practice groups and industry teams

Commitment to Pro Bono and Community Service

Latham lawyers and professional staff performed approximately 225,000 hours of pro bono work in 2019 and approximately 3.7 million hours between 2000-2019, valued at more than US$1.8 billion

Signatory to Pro Bono Institute’s global Law Firm Pro Bono Challenge
Learn more by reading our 2019 Pro Bono Annual Review.

Women Enriching Business (WEB)
The Women Enriching Business (WEB) Committee promotes the long-term success of women lawyers and executives around the globe, and empowers them to become industry leaders

Since its founding more than a decade ago, WEB has held more than 700 successful events throughout the United States, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia

Latham Sustainability
Latham’s global program seeks to reduce its environmental…

I am not certain what significance there might be about “Barcelona,” which we see on the document. However, the home page of this web site shows “COVID-19 RESOURCES.” Spain has been hit hard. Are they soliciting help from Latham and Watkins about the Covid disaster?

Why would this organization be operating out of a STARBUCK’S for crying out loud????

I was not able too find a CONTACT US or to verify their Washington address on their website, indeed they claim not to have a corporate HQ, which is weird in itself - but I thought FReeQs and anons might be interested in this following page from their web site:

https://www.lw.com/practices/wevegotwashingtoncovered

Is there a secret area in the Starbuck’s for such high powered operations to be based? Or am I as nutz as I think I sound??? Would the Washington DC location for this international team really be in a Starbuck’s? Why would they receive mail there, as apparently they do, if we believe the document Q shows us is real?

And just one final idle question, which I have no way of resolving. Just wondering if the Watkins in Latham and Watkins has any kinship or connection to ECW? Probably not, since he is not described to be a lawyer, and most compellingly, the firm sounds as though it may possibly be a derp firm….but worth asking anyway, IMHO. Maybe ECW has
a 3rd cousin twice removed or something there. Or, most likely, no connection at all.

END PART TWO OF TWO about #4310

Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q


680 posted on 05/24/2020 6:30:49 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; Swordmaker; Steven W.; TXnMA; ..

ADDENDUM TO THE DIG ON #4310

STARBUCK’S?

I was really caught up in the above parts of this dig by discovering in my MAPS program that the address found in that #4310 drop on another document seen under the Rice document turned out to be a Starbuck’s location.

A while ago, I went back to that MAPS image, and thought to toggle it from the Maps function to the Satellite function.

There is a VERY large building at that location, which cannot all be Starbuck’s. My guess is that at least part of it truly is the DC office of Latham and Watkins. The Map function is probably for visitors who what to know where to get their lattes and find the other touristy kinds of places.

But still it is odd that the L&W is not identified. I wonder if the mapping software people would be charging for the advertising of location....or if it is a very prestigious group, they don’t what a bunch of people bothering them and they desire privacy. Or perhaps some other explanation is possible.

FWIW, on the rooftop of that building complex, there is what appears to be a putting green.

END ADDENDUM TO #4310 DIG
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q QQ Q Q Q Q Q


1,074 posted on 05/25/2020 6:33:17 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson