Adam Housley's Sources - Deep State News Is Tip of the Iceberg

On Trey Gowdy, who was on the Congressional Committee looking into Benghazi:

Someone tweeted "Did you READ the Benghazi report? I did. All of it. 800 pages plus exhibits. It was exhaustive. Heads should have rolled, but committee could not indict. Gowdy did an outstanding job. You probably didn’t hear that b/c media didn’t report. As usual." Housley's reponse: "This is crap. The report flat out missed a ton. They only focused on HRC, which should have had significant focus, while failing to even entertain other areas. I likely interviewed more people there than they did."

When someone tweeted "Everyone’s hands were tied back then. No one made the other side look worse than Trey Gowdy. He exposed them, which was all they could do at the time.", Housley's response was "Not true. Sorry."

Another tweet, "There's nothing Gowdy could have done to make the Bengazi thing better. His hands were tied, everybody around him was corrupt!" Adam's response, "Bull".

When someone tweeted "A lot wasn’t made available to him....the Benghazi hearings showed that Republicans were being stymied at every turn...I’m sure he would like to see the cabal that allowed Benghazi go down!", Housley answered, "There is some truth in that...they also flat out avoided stuff too."

Later added, "I am NOT saying he is a part of this...but I am told Gowdy is trying to redeem himself. I know his Benghazi committee wasn’t good. Missed, or didn’t look, at a bunch of stuff."

The destruction of Americans privacy "began before Obama with the loosely designed Patriot Act and even before that."

"Ooooooh brother. Massive surveillance...that’s what’s been found. 'MASSIVE' is the way it was sent to me."

He says there is blame to go around both sides. "Just make sure you apply the same outrage to each individual...and of course more outrage depending on what they did. Don’t give your own party a pass even if it’s 50 in 1 party and 8 in another. I’m just throwing numbers out there."

"I've reported Brennan ran his own opp."

"I am told...Flynn is the tip of the iceberg...this gets worse. 'Adam you are looking at the foyer of a house that is a 20 bedroom mansion'"

"More: I'm told don't fixate on the requestor. It is possible these were just the accessor codes being used which is a grey area. For example Powers could have been used by Rhodes. Biden may have been his Nat Security Advisor...either way it implicates them."

"No report for 29, 30, or 31st of December is big! Only 2 reasons that date wasn’t listed. Either NSA didn’t intercept call and it was CIA, or that info is front of the grand jury and that person is either a target or a witness."

Someone asked, "How do they explain so many of the requests being PRIOR to the Kislyak call that SUPPOSEDLY was the predicate for the investigation?" Adam responsed, "THIS IS EXACTLY THE POINT!! Thank You."

"There was NSA product being gathered on General Michael Flynn before the Kislyak phone call. That is flat out spying."

He was asked, "Do you believe in coincidences? Biden's unmasking request was made on January 12, 2017. And, on January 12, 2017, Ignatius writes a bombshell story in WaPo detailing Flynn's December 29th conversations with Kislyak." Housley responded, "There are 'reporters' who will have a lot of explaining to do."

"It's all about the timeline to prove a man..an innocent man...was set up. Biden, Brennan unmasking request came on the same day as Ignatius column on the General Flynn-Kislyak call. This....is...not....good."

In response to Clapper's recent CNN interview in which he said he did not find evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, Housley tweets "Let the spin begin. This is gonna be 1983 Moonwalk stuff."

Judge Alex Ferrer tweeted to Adam, "Despite the fact that much of the media will try to kill it with claims that it’s a conspiracy theory or, their favorite, that it has been debunked, this has the potential to become the next real Watergate." Housley's response was, "Judge there is real concern here and I don't care which party you line up with. This evidence is freaking massive."

When asked, "Could you do a summary of the next tranches of intel coming from Grenell please?", he says, "I think the next list coming...some of the names unmasked. Just a hunch."

He was asked "Why has not one single @FBI Agent anywhere, stepped forward to honor their oath to the US CONSTITUTION and whistle blow on the illegal actions taking place withing the Bureau and Obama administration? NOT. ONE. SINGLE. AGENT." Housley answered "Some have. You'll see."

Another asked "Are there no good people at headquarters who could have come out years ago?" and Adam answered "Don't know. Some are helping now I am told."

"The massive majority had no idea what was going on. Headquarters is a completely separate location."

"AND...some have flipped I'm told. You just don't know about it because it is part of the ongoing investigation. They didn't go to the media."

"They are all ratting on each other....they have no choice."

"As I mentioned a couple have flipped. Baker being one."

"They supported him (Comey) when he was fired because they had no idea what was going on...that support quickly began to flip."

"Also told that the rank and file in the field...remember completely disconnected from headquarters in DC...are 'sick about what they are hearing was done to Flynn.' They are also 'pissed that this could eventually hurt their abilities in fighting for national security'"

"I'm told the is terrified about losing its FISA capabilities. That was the word to me terrified' and many are pissed at what they call the 'Comeyites'"

"As I’m told the list Grenell brought over is much larger than anything involving Flynn. 'The exact tasking flow is hard to discern because the stuff was flying everywhere.'"

Other tidbits:

"As I have reported before and am reminding now. McCabe held secret meetings and his "crew" would either join him off site, or Skype in. This stuff as I broke, started waaaaaay before Trump. It was about power. Internally at the Bureau also."

"Journalists were absolutely targeted and watched."

"Also a big question...was an intel analyst using Samantha Powers access to cover up their ops? That's a huge violation."

"Someone needs to ask Bernie...I've said this before...if he thinks he, or his wife, were observed"

"Remember that group at the FBI is just part of the scope."

"I reported that several years ago...so yes...other candidates in BOTH parties were surveilled"

"I mentioned Jane Harman recently for a reason."

About the Flynn ordeal:

He was asked "What was the timing of "Putting Flynn under investigation"? It was before Trump officially pick him as NSA (I think) .. but was it during a time when "inside baseball" rumblings indicated it would be Flynn?" Housley's response "They started on Flynn in 2014. He first pissed them off in 2012...waaaaay before Trump"

He was asked "So if son WASN’T involved in anything criminal, then what was Flynn 'protecting?', and Adam's response, "This isn't nuclear science folks. They were making stuff up to bust people. Have you not read what's been released?"

Someone said the following about Judge Sullivan, "And the amount of restraint he has shown so far in the face of Flynn's recalcitrant flip-flopping is commendable." Adam didn't hold back: "Flip Flopping??!! You guys are reprehensible after seeing the facts and what they did to purposely set him up. What has happened to our country? For goodness sake...will someone step away from their damn politics for once!!"

"The way judge Sullivan is basically re-opening a case that clearly was dirty is unbelievable. It's as if he hasn't seen or read any of the updated and released evidence. It would make sense if he was doing this a year ago, but now? wow...just wow."

"What we are all watching is a chess match amongst powers that are on a different board than the rest of us. The Flynn judge maneuver today is one example. Draw that out and keep him away. Meantime, more declass is coming."

In regards to the Durham investigation:

"I don’t know Durham. I just know this...behind the scenes he has a ton of admirers. People I know to be on both sides of the aisle, but not extremists. I’ve also been told this....Durham is a lawman...and he took down the Irish mob, FBI &cops in Boston...he doesn’t like deals"

"Lot's of talk by 'experts'...man I they come out of the woodwork...about people interviewed by Durham. Targets aren't usually interviewed unless they are seeking to turn em. Durham I'm told doesn't work with people who break the law much. He makes few deals I am told."

He says he was told everything changed when it became a criminal investigation "with power of subpoena and seizure...and the ability to declass delegated to Barr."

"Remember....things start as a query. Then spins up to an investigation with power to compel. Then to a Grand Jury for marginal indictments. Then Grand Jury indictments put forward in RICO type prosecution. I am told we are near the end. It's a matter of who and when?"

This is just the last week. You may want to follow him on Twitter.

“I would but I have been banned by Twitter.”

They shadow banned me so bad I could tweet for a month and nobody saw it.

Gee, there you go ...

Talking about having normal discussion, but you don’t care what opinion I hold, calling me and other men angry because we hold opinions different from yours. And then to put icing on the cake you don’t agree to disagree, but “promise I’ll never engage with you again”. Piece of work, you are.

Ok I lied. You TOTALLY mischaracterized what I said.

I don’t care what your opinion is meaning it doesn’t affect me. As mine doesn’t affect you. I don’t care or I don’t mind that you have a different opinion. Sound ok? That’s actually called agreeing to disagree.

I NEVER said men who disagreed with me are angry. Never said it! Read again.

You have a snide way of speaking understanding this has no context. Just don’t assign words or thoughts to me I don’t have. Is that ok?

And yes this forum I notice is filled with old men who are nasty. Not talking to me but to others. Often. I can read. That’s why I rarely post. Way long ago it was filled with some of the most interesting witty fun posters. There are still some great people here. But not the same, not even close and it’s disappointing.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.