[bagster]

He would not have branded it “ObamaGate” if he didn’t have the goods.

Absolutely. He's not stupid enough to say something like that without knowing it to be true. He hasn't yet and never will.

[generally]

>>He would not have branded it “ObamaGate” if he didn’t have the goods.

>>Absolutely. He’s not stupid enough to say something like that without knowing it to be true. He hasn’t yet and never will.

---

Reminds me strongly of early in his Presidency when Trump said he was being wiretapped. MSM/libs mocked him. Intensely.

First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win.

[EasySt]

He would not have branded it “ObamaGate” if he didn’t have
the goods.
~~~~~~~~~~
“Absolutely. He’s not stupid enough to say something like
that without knowing it to be true. He hasn’t yet and never
will.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Allow me to pic a tiny nit,
because I tried to be precise in what I said.

It’s not what he knows.
It is what he has the goods to prove.
I’m certain he believed it all along.

Now that he WILL prove it,
is when he moves to brand it.

I’ve been waiting for our President to brand Obamagate,
because I’ve always seen it as being the final sign that
“We” really DO have it all.

But that’s just me.

;-)
~Easy