agree or disagree
There is no prove it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I believe it’s healthy to try to make sense of one another’s theories, and to ask for explanation when they don’t make sense. Early on, we had someone on our thread demanding all theories be treated as equal and no logical critique offered. We never went that way - instead we work together refine our logical thinking and that often results in debate.
It’s almost as if assertions of RR’s guilt are appropriate to debate but assertions of his innocence are not. Assertions of a massive sting operation are not appropriate to question, but assertions that black hats lead the Russia Hoax should be restrained, delayed for later.
Agreed.
I should have made more of having an aversion to adamancy in proof. Civil discussion is good.
See? I’ve grown.