Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Modest Alternative to a Massive State Pension Bailout
American Thinker ^ | 5 May, 2020 | William Sullivan

Posted on 05/05/2020 5:41:06 AM PDT by MtnClimber

Interviewed by Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday, New Jersey governor Phil Murphy praises Donald Trump for having been supportive of New Jersey’s health care needs, but Wallace reminds him:

One area, however, Governor, where you haven’t gotten help, either from the president or from Senate Republicans, is on the question of state aid -- federal aid, passed by Congress, signed by the president -- to go to states like yours to pay for, uh, first responders, teachers, and all the services, with the huge revenue hit that you’ve taken because of the coronavirus. You’ve said this week -- your word -- that if you don’t get state aid, it’s gonna be “Armageddon.”

“The old legacy stuff.” That’s a pretty sly means of referencing New Jersey’s notoriously bloated pension promises that were negotiated and enshrined by generations of corrupt union bosses and state legislators.

Only a fool could be duped by this shell game. Yes, of course this would amount to a federal bailout of mismanaged and bloated state pensions.

And it raises an important moral question. Why should a private worker in, say, Texas, be liable to pay for the horrible financial quagmire that New Jersey union bosses and politicians created in their own state? What should a taxpayer in Texas have to do with any of that? Shouldn’t payouts to pensioners in New Jersey be adjusted, or perhaps the salaries for current public workers adjusted to reflect reduced revenue, or furloughs at least be considered to address the state’s lack of liquidity, before demanding that taxpayers from other states pay for the problems that reckless unions and politicians in New Jersey created all by themselves?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2020 5:41:06 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
But, if government and union workers had to worry about sound management of pensions they would not: Vote Blue no Matter who Raped You"

Why not make them save in 401K accounts like everyone else. And, why don't they lose their jobs too if the government shuts down the economy?

2 posted on 05/05/2020 5:44:30 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Cap yearly pensions at $30k. That’s better than the rest of us. Next raise the age to 70. Cops are different but then very few make it to 20 years.


3 posted on 05/05/2020 5:48:37 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why bailout the pensions and not the 401ks?

We are told that the stock market crash only affects “the rich” (including retirees). It hits pensions too.

No bailout.


4 posted on 05/05/2020 5:50:00 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- “First thing I’d do is repeal those Trump tax cuts.” (May 4th, 2019))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

New Jersey’s biggest problem by far is it’s Welfare rolls. People move there just for that!


5 posted on 05/05/2020 5:55:35 AM PDT by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Here’s modest proposal: cut government by 90%.


6 posted on 05/05/2020 6:07:21 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (It's official! I'm nominated for the 2020 Mr. Hyperbole and Sarcasm Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
And it raises an important moral question. Why should a private worker in, say, Texas, be liable to pay for the horrible financial quagmire that New Jersey union bosses and politicians created in their own state?

Taxation without representation.

7 posted on 05/05/2020 6:07:52 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
What's ironic about all this is that we're finally facing the grim reality that undermines the delusions we've had for decades: A pension system is unsustainable almost by definition. This idea that someone can be paid for decades without being gainfully employed is the height of idiocy.

The other irony is that the gross injustice of state-run pension systems played a much bigger role in the collapse of communist governments in Eastern Europe than most of us may realize.

8 posted on 05/05/2020 6:07:52 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Why are cops different? I would suggest that you get involved with your local city government or at least attend their budget hearings.

As a former city manager I hate to burst anyone’s bubble, but behind the closed doors the primary attitude of the police officers and their protected union bargaining status is more, more, more, as in give them all of the money they need and cut every other departments budget to pay for it regardless of impact to the public

If the city has healthy reserves, then the cops are gong to want that. They will play the “its for the safety of the children” card to get the public on their side. Behind the scenes they are the worst spoiled children of a rich daddy. They think it’s their right to everything. They milk overtime to increase their pension. And then there is the infighting. They will cut each other’s throat to take from a brother officer if they think that officer is getting something their not.

It’s not about your or my safety. Its always about the money.


9 posted on 05/05/2020 6:14:58 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

It is not as if many of the government employees in these corrupt states did not have extra income from things like bribes, theft of government property and organized crime involvement.


10 posted on 05/05/2020 6:17:25 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Yeah, it has been close to two decades since most private companies eliminated defined pensions and substituted 401K accounts with various levels of match.

It is high time governments do the same. However, if places like New Jersey get bailouts, it should only be under the following conditions:

  1. Loans, not grants.
  2. Loss of statehood and revision to territorial status until the loans are repaid in full.
  3. With the new territorial status, they lose all representation in congress, save for one non-voting delegate in the House (as territories currently enjoy) and no electoral vote in presidential elections.

11 posted on 05/05/2020 6:18:32 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
New Jersey’s notoriously bloated pension promises that were negotiated and enshrined by generations of corrupt union bosses and state legislators.

Not just Jersey, every state that has suffered Democrat leadership

12 posted on 05/05/2020 6:18:38 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (#openupstateny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Why bailout the pensions and not the 401ks? We are told that the stock market crash only affects “the rich” (including retirees). It hits pensions too. No bailout.

Exactly

13 posted on 05/05/2020 6:19:05 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (#openupstateny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Let the pension system go bankrupt. In bankruptcy, adjust the per-retiree payout to what is sustainable.

This accomplishes two things: it puts the pension fund into a sustainable state, and it gives notice to the public-employee unions that their pensions are dependent upon the health of the US economy, and that they should promote the health of the US economy.


14 posted on 05/05/2020 6:21:49 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Why is it that so many of the ‘heroes’ of the plannedemic belong to unions?

🤔

15 posted on 05/05/2020 6:23:57 AM PDT by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The “legacy” stuff is the states’ responsibility. It ALL precedes the Wuhan Virus and arose from state mismanagement that went on for decades. They can spend decades now fixing those problems themselves. Those problems are a self-inflicted injuries that the people of the other states should not have to pay for through higher federal expenditures.

Other states did not make those mistakes, so to their credit they are in better shape now in spite of the Wuhan Virus. They are to be celebrated, not made to pay for poorly run states mistakes.


16 posted on 05/05/2020 6:26:10 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Shouldn’t all be responsible to choose wisely to select those who are responsible for managing retirement assets, including taxpayers?

When retirement funds are not fully funded or when the funding loses value due to risks of life that we all experience, then why should taxpayers be responsible?

The mismanagement by democrat governments and the wasteful spending should be dealt with by the voters of that government and not all voters (wealth redistribution).


17 posted on 05/05/2020 6:47:26 AM PDT by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Nope

No alternative and no bailout.


18 posted on 05/05/2020 6:54:42 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

State and corporate pension funds use real estate as a safe means of investment. This shutdown is killing those incomes. I suspect by October that retirees are going to find those 5% safe incomes are half or less of what they were before.


19 posted on 05/05/2020 6:59:44 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Before we even have this discussion, all Public Employee’s should be Required to take their 60-90 day UNPAID FURLOUGH, Locked in their Homes, with Severe Penalties for any Violations, just like the Citizens had to do.

Then we can talk about Abolishing ALL Defined Benefit Plans, rel3enquishing All Pension Assets to Social Security and Rolling them All into Social Security for their retirement.


20 posted on 05/05/2020 7:05:35 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson