To: ransomnote
Barr should have already pursued this. By not going after these tyrant Governors, and Mayors, he is basically condoning their behavior. If they aren’t stopped now, they will only be emboldened.
6 posted on
04/21/2020 6:36:54 PM PDT by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
To: mass55th
somebody post the bagpipes and shoulder shrug!
22 posted on
04/21/2020 6:49:40 PM PDT by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: mass55th
The DOJ does not pursue these cases on its own. The first thing that has to happen is that a person or organization that is affected by an illegal shutdown order needs to take the first step of filing a legal challenge themselves. At that point, the DOJ joins the legal action as an interested party in the case. Barr refers to this in his statement.
In other words, the DOJ will not be a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit. That's because the DOJ is not a victim of this government overreach and therefore does not have the legal standing to file a lawsuit. Instead, it will bring its resources to assist anyone else who DOES have the legal standing to challenge these actions.
25 posted on
04/21/2020 6:55:55 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
To: mass55th
I hope this isn't the case.
38 posted on
04/21/2020 7:16:37 PM PDT by
timestax
To: mass55th
Get the armchair reupholstered so it is befitting of the quarterbacking...
76 posted on
04/22/2020 4:45:27 AM PDT by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson