Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden Calls CV-19 An ‘Opportunity’ To ‘Fundamentally Change The Science Relating To Global Warming’
Explain Life ^ | 04/20/2020 | Martin Walsh

Posted on 04/20/2020 8:25:45 AM PDT by Rusty0604

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Rusty0604

I think Biden has serious dementia and is now just parroting previously made phrases and stringing them together.


21 posted on 04/20/2020 8:59:09 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

“fundamentally change the science relating to global warming.”

Well yeah, if the pandemic’s reduction in fossil fuel usage causes the atmosphere to cool then human-caused “global warming” is real. If the left keeps bitching about how the atmosphere is still warming after this then global warming is just what it’s always been, a hoax.

Lessee, which way should I bet?


22 posted on 04/20/2020 9:17:06 AM PDT by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Joe is twenty years behind the times—the politically correct version is “climate change”, not global warming.

Now, if Joe reverts back a bit further he can go for “global cooling”:

https://harpers.org/archive/1958/09/the-coming-ice-age/


23 posted on 04/20/2020 9:19:13 AM PDT by cgbg (New poll: post elderly voters like Biden's experience as Wilson's VP fighting the Spanish Flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
we can create, seriously create 10 million good-paying jobs

And in the process destroy 10s of millions of other great paying jobs.

24 posted on 04/20/2020 9:24:09 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Guess he didn’t see NASA’s 2007 report on the earth axis tilting east not west causing north pole warming and not Global Warming.


25 posted on 04/20/2020 9:26:15 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
seriously create 10 million good-paying jobs

To replace the 30 or 40 million jobs that will ultimately be lost due to this interminable House Arrest?

26 posted on 04/20/2020 9:29:50 AM PDT by Ratman0823 (2020 Logic: We all stand together when we all stand apart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I’ve thought that too.


27 posted on 04/20/2020 9:36:33 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

So we have climate change “science”
Based on computer modeling and our recent experience with
Modeling makes implementing climate change initiatives more compelling? Obviously Joe must be smarter than me, because in my mind those don’t add up


28 posted on 04/20/2020 9:38:22 AM PDT by j.havenfarm ( Beginning my 20th year on FR! 2,500+ replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nagant

Don’t give them any ideas. Anyway, that’s why they changed it from “global warming” to “climate change”.


29 posted on 04/20/2020 9:38:47 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I remember we going to freeze to death in the 70s.


30 posted on 04/20/2020 9:39:59 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Isn’t that what they said after the financial crisis?


31 posted on 04/20/2020 9:41:04 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: know.your.why
"Not now Marjorie, I'm inspecting the troops"
32 posted on 04/20/2020 9:41:13 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

But his 10 million jobs will be in China.


33 posted on 04/20/2020 9:41:39 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

The models can be whatever “the experts” want them to be.


34 posted on 04/20/2020 9:44:00 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I gave up trying to follow this guys train (wreck) of thought after replaying three times. Comeon man! Look... you gotta.... we gotta...

Just having a sit down dinner-chat with this man would drive me nuts. I really dont think that I could do it sober.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqoOF9JQnMo


35 posted on 04/20/2020 9:45:04 AM PDT by know.your.why ( If love is blind then marriage is an institution for the blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Joe Birdbrain strikes again.


36 posted on 04/20/2020 9:46:00 AM PDT by antidemoncrat (uff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Shovel ready jobs. None were to be found. 8>)


37 posted on 04/20/2020 9:47:10 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Then Obama said maybe they weren’t all that shovel ready. And the press just laughed along with him.


38 posted on 04/20/2020 9:55:44 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

The $cience has been so accurate thus far on this $cientifically manipulated virus, we should give $cience research into global warming a much closer look. Needs $crutiny from those who are independent of the research.


39 posted on 04/20/2020 10:01:10 AM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Biden Calls CV-19 An ‘Opportunity’ To ‘Fundamentally Change The Science Relating To Global Warming’

I agree completely. First, let's doubt any model that is so sensitive to input values and assumed relations that it can be off by a factor of 100 or more.

People who confuse the model with reality end up chewing on the menu at restaurants. Right, Joe?

40 posted on 04/20/2020 10:12:10 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parachutes are only anecdotally effective due to the lack of significant double blind testing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson